Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305148›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Psychological Support for Personality (PSP) versus treatment as usual: study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial of a low intensity intervention for people with personality disorder.

Mike J Crawford, Lavanya Thana, Jennie Parker, Oliver Turner, Kwek Pei Xing, Mary McMurran, Paul Moran, Timothy Weaver, Barbara Barrett, Amy Claringbold and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mike J CrawfordPersonality Disorder Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK. m.crawford@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3137-5772
Lavanya ThanaPersonality Disorder Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jennie ParkerResearch and Development Department, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust, Stephenson House, 75 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2PL, UK.
Oliver TurnerBarnet, Enfield and Haringey NHS Foundation Trust, St Ann's Hospital, St Ann's Road, Haringey, London, N15 3TH, UK.
Kwek Pei XingPersonality Disorder Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mary McMurranSection of Forensic Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Paul MoranSchool of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol University, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
Timothy WeaverMental Health Social Work & Integrative Medicine, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, London, NW4 4BT, UK.
Barbara BarrettCentre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Amy ClaringboldPersonality Disorder Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Paul BassettStatsconsultancy Limited, 40 Longwood Lane, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, HP7 9EN, UK.
Rahil SanatiniaPersonality Disorder Research Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBCentral and North West London NHS Foundation Trust · GBDorset HealthCare University NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBMiddlesex University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0215-36065Research for Patient Benefit Programme PB-PG-0215-36065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of long-term psychological treatment for people with some types of personality disorder. However, the high intensity and cost of these interventions limit their availability. Lower-intensity interventions are increasingly being offered to people with personality disorder, but their clinical and cost effectiveness have not been properly tested in experimental studies. We therefore set out to develop a low intensity intervention for people with personality disorder and to test the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical effectiveness of this intervention with that of treatment as usual (TAU).

methodsA two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of Psychological Support for Personality (PSP) versus TAU for people aged over 18 years, who are using secondary care mental health services and have personality disorder. We will exclude people with co-existing organic or psychotic mental disorders (dementia, bipolar affective disorder, delusional disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizotypal disorder), those with cognitive or language difficulties that would preclude them from providing informed consent or compromise participation in study procedures, and those who are already receiving psychological treatment for personality disorder. Participants will be randomized via a remote system in a ratio of PSP to TAU of 1:1. Randomization will be stratified according to the referring team and gender of the participant. A single follow-up assessment will be conducted by masked researchers 24 weeks after randomization to assess mental health (using the Warwick and Edinburgh Well-Being Schedule), social functioning (using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), incidence of suicidal behavior, satisfaction with care (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire), and resource use and costs using a modified version of the Adult Service Use Schedule. In addition to this, each participant will be asked to complete the patient version of the Clinical Global Impression Scale. Feasibility and acceptability will primarily be judged by study recruitment rate and engagement and retention in treatment. The analysis will focus principally on descriptive data on the rate of recruitment, characteristics of participants, attrition, adherence to therapy, and follow-up. We will explore the distribution of study outcomes to investigate assumptions of normality in order to plan the analysis and sample size of a future definitive trial. DISCUSSION: Most people with personality disorder do not currently receive evidence-based interventions. While a number of high intensity psychological treatments have been shown to be effective, there is an urgent need to develop effective low intensity approaches to help people unable to use existing treatments. PSP is a low intensity intervention for individuals, which was developed following extensive consultation with users and providers of services for people with personality disorder. This study aims to examine the feasibility of a randomized trial of PSP compared to TAU for people with personality disorder.

trial registrationISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN14994755 . Registered on 18 July 2017.

Indexed as

PersonalityPsychosocial Support SystemsFeasibility StudiesHumansLondonMental HealthPatient SatisfactionPersonality DisordersPsychotherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodSocial BehaviorTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBrief interventionLow intensityPersonality disorderPsychological treatmentRandomized trialSuicidal behavior

Identifiers

PMID30305148
PMCPMC6180621
OpenAlexW2896690108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.