Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305115›Full record

Trial reportJournal of hematology & oncology2018

Molecular profiling of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers from patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the CARMINA 02 trial (UCBG-0609).

Xu Liang, Adrien Briaux, Véronique Becette, Camille Benoist, Anais Boulai, Walid Chemlali, Anne Schnitzler, Sylvain Baulande, Sofia Rivera, Marie-Ange Mouret-Reynier and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00629616 (A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Study Identifying Hormone Sensitivity Profiles and Evaluating the Efficacy of Anastrozole and Fulvestrant in the Neo-adjuvant Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women.), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00629616 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Study Identifying Hormone Sensitivity Profiles and Evaluating the Efficacy of Anastrozole and Fulvestrant in the Neo-adjuvant Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUNICANCERRan2007 to 2018Enrolled116ConditionsBreast CancerArmsanastrozole, fulvestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. ConcomitantJournal of breast cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The immunomodulatory effects of endocrine therapy in breast cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xu LiangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Adrien BriauxPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Véronique BecetteDepartment of Biopathology, Curie Institute, René Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, France.
Camille BenoistPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Anais BoulaiPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Walid ChemlaliPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Anne SchnitzlerPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Sylvain BaulandeInstitut Curie Genomics of Excellence (ICGex) Platform, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Sofia RiveraDepartment of Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Marie-Ange Mouret-ReynierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Laurence Venat BouvetDepartment of Medical Oncology, CHU, Limoges, France.
Thibaut De La Motte RougeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Jérôme LemonnierR&D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France.
Florence LereboursDepartment of Medical Oncology, Curie Institute, René Huguenin Hospital, Saint-Cloud, France.
Céline CallensPharmacogenomic Unit, Department of Genetics, Curie Institute, PSL Research University, Paris, France. celine.callens@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3377-4937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostmenopausal women with large, hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and low-proliferative breast cancer derived a benefit from neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) in the CARMINA02 trial. This study was designed to correlate gene expression and mutation profiles with both response to NET and prognosis.

methodsGene expression profiling using RNA sequencing was performed in 86 pre-NET and post-NET tumor samples. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 91 candidate breast cancer-associated genes was performed on DNA samples from 89 patients. Molecular data were correlated with radiological response and relapse-free survival.

resultsThe transcriptional profile of tumors to NET in responders involved immune-associated genes enriched in activated Th1 pathway, which remained unchanged in non-responders. Immune response was confirmed by analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). The percentage of TILs was significantly increased post-NET compared to pre-NET samples in responders (p = 0.0071), but not in non-responders (p = 0.0938). Gene expression revealed that lipid metabolism was the main molecular function related to prognosis, while PPARγ is the most important upstream regulator gene. The most frequently mutated genes were PIK3CA (48.3%), CDH1 (20.2%), PTEN (15.7%), TP53 (10.1%), LAMA2 (10.1%), BRCA2 (9.0%), MAP3K1 (7.9%), ALK (6.7%), INPP4B (6.7%), NCOR1 (6.7%), and NF1 (5.6%). Cell cycle and apoptosis pathway and PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway were altered significantly more frequently in non-responders than in responders (p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0094, respectively). The average number of mutations per sample was significantly higher in endocrine-resistant tumors (2.88 vs. 1.64, p = 0.03), but no difference was observed in terms of prognosis. ESR1 hotspot mutations were detected in 3.4% of treatment-naive tumors.

conclusionsThe Th1-related immune system and lipid metabolism appear to play key roles in the response to endocrine therapy and prognosis in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Deleterious somatic mutations in the cell cycle and apoptosis pathway and PIK3CA/AKT/mTOR pathway may be relevant for clinical management.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT00629616 ) on March 6, 2008, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AgedAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFulvestrantGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingNeoadjuvant TherapyPostmenopausePrognosisRNA, NeoplasmTh1 CellsAnastrozoleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalDNA, NeoplasmFulvestrantRNA, NeoplasmBreast cancerEndocrine therapyImmunityLipid metabolismRNA sequencingSomatic mutationTargeted NGSTILs

Identifiers

PMID30305115
PMCPMC6180434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.