Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305104›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Elderly at risk in care transitions When discharge summaries are poorly transferred and used -a descriptive study.

Gabriella Caleres, Åsa Bondesson, Patrik Midlöv, Sara Modig

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improving the quality of inpatient discharge summaries.The International journal of risk & safety in medicine · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriella CaleresDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, SE-20213, Malmö, Sweden. gabriella.caleres@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5296-3656
Åsa BondessonDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, SE-20213, Malmö, Sweden.
Patrik MidlövDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, SE-20213, Malmö, Sweden.
Sara ModigDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Malmö/Family Medicine, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Box 50332, SE-20213, Malmö, Sweden.
Malmö University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDischarge summary with medication report effectively counteracts drug-related problems among elderly patients due to insufficient information transfer in care transitions. However, this requires optimal transfer and use of the discharge summaries. This study aimed to examine information transfer with discharge summaries from hospital to primary care.

methodsA descriptive study with data consisting of discharge summaries of 115 patients, 75 years or older, using five or more drugs, collected during one week from 28 different hospital wards in Skåne county, Sweden. Two weeks after discharge, information transfer was examined via review of primary care medical records. It was noted whether the discharge summary was received (i.e. scanned to the primary care medical records), if the medication list was updated with drug changes and if a patient chart entry regarding medication or its follow-up was made in the primary care medical records. An electronic survey, which was sent to 151 primary care units in Skåne county, was used to examine experiences of the information transfer.

resultsOut of 115 discharge summaries, 47 (41%) were found in the primary care medical records. Patient chart entries regarding medication or its follow-up were seen in 53 (46%) cases. Drug changes during hospitalisation were seen in 51 out of 76 patients without multidose drug dispensing. In 16 (31%) out of these cases, medication lists were updated in primary care medical records. In the electronic survey, 22 (21%) out of the 107 responding primary care units reported the discharge summary was often received on the day of discharge, while 71 (66%) respondents indicated the discharge summary was always/often received but later. Medication list updates and patient chart entries in the primary care medical records were always/often done upon receipt of the discharge summary according to 61 (57%) respondents.

conclusionThe transfer of information was often deficient and the discharge summaries were insufficiently used. Many discharge summaries were lost, an insufficient proportion of medication lists were updated and patient chart entries were often lacking. These findings may increase the risk of medication errors and drug-related problems for elderly in care transitions.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient TransferPrimary Health CareAgedContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMedical RecordsMedication ErrorsSwedenDischarge summaryElderlyInformation transferPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID30305104
PMCPMC6180642
OpenAlexW2897395816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.