Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305097›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2018

A lipidated bi-epitope vaccine comprising of MHC-I and MHC-II binder peptides elicits protective CD4 T cell and CD8 T cell immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Pradeep K Rai, Sathi Babu Chodisetti, Sudeep K Maurya, Sajid Nadeem, Weiguang Zeng, Ashok K Janmeja, David C Jackson, Javed N Agrewala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Peptide-Based Vaccines for Tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Tuberculosis: The success tale of less explored dormantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pradeep K RaiCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Sathi Babu ChodisettiCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Sudeep K MauryaCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Sajid NadeemCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India.
Weiguang ZengDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Ashok K JanmejaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
David C JacksonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Javed N AgrewalaCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. jagrewala@iitrpr.ac.in.
Institute of Microbial Technology · INPeter Doherty Institute · AUGovernment Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research OLP-0088Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology GAP 103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical trials conducted at Chingleput India suggest that BCG fails to protect against tuberculosis (TB) in TB-endemic population. Recent studies advocate that non-tuberculous mycobacteria and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection interferes in the antigen processing and presentation of BCG in inducing protective immunity against Mtb. Thereby, indicating that any vaccine that require extensive antigen processing may not be efficacious in TB-endemic zones. Recently, we have demonstrated that the vaccine candidate L91, which is composed of lipidated promiscuous MHC-II binder epitope, derived from latency associated Acr1 antigen of Mtb is immunogenic in the murine and Guinea pig models of TB and conferred better protection than BCG against Mtb.

methodsIn this study, we have used a multi-stage based bi-epitope vaccine, namely L4.8, comprising of MHC-I and MHC-II binding peptides of active (TB10.4) and latent (Acr1) stages of Mtb antigens, respectively. These peptides were conjugated to the TLR-2 agonist Pam2Cys.

resultsL4.8 significantly elicited both CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells immunity, as evidenced by increase in the enduring polyfunctional CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells. L4.8 efficiently declined Mtb-burden and protected animals better than BCG and L91, even at the late stage of Mtb infection.

conclusionsThe BCG-L4.8 prime boost strategy imparts a better protection against TB than the BCG alone. This study emphatically denotes that L4.8 can be a promising future vaccine candidate for controlling active and latent TB.

Indexed as

AnimalsBCG VaccineCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopesFemaleHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIImmunityImmunizationImmunologic MemoryInterferon-gammaInterleukin-17LipidsMice, Inbred BALB CMycobacterium tuberculosisBCG VaccineEpitopesHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIInterferon-gammaInterleukin-17LipidsMtbMultistage vaccinePromiscuous peptideTBTh17 cellsTh1 cellsTLR-2

Identifiers

PMID30305097
PMCPMC6180631
OpenAlexW2898074496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.