Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30305092›Full record

Trial reportBMC veterinary research2018

A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a once weekly two dose otic gel containing florfenicol, terbinafine and betamethasone administered for the treatment of canine otitis externa.

S B King, K P Doucette, W Seewald, S L Forster

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC veterinary research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic characterization ofMicrobial genomics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity ofVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S B KingElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
K P DoucetteElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
W SeewaldElanco Animal Health Inc., Mattenstrasse 24a, CH-4058, Basel, Switzerland.
S L ForsterElanco Animal Health Ltd., Lilly House, Priestley Road, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NL, UK. sophie.forster@elanco.com.
Elanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOtitis externa is a common problem in small animal practice. Compliance with daily treatment is a major cause of treatment failure. The hypothesis tested is that a novel otic gel applied to the ear canal twice with a one-week interval is as efficacious as a daily otic suspension in the treatment of canine otitis externa. The study included 286 privately owned dogs with otitis externa. In this single blinded randomized study, enrolled dogs received either an otic gel containing 1% florfenicol, 1% terbinafine and 0.1% betamethasone acetate twice with a one-week interval or a suspension containing hydrocortisone aceponate, miconazole and gentamicin daily for 5 days. Ears were cleaned with saline prior to administration of the first dose of medication. Dogs were evaluated at day (D) 0, 7, 28 and 56 with an otitis index score (OTIS-3), otic culture and cytology, pain and pruritus, and overall response to treatment (owner and investigator evaluation). Outcome measures were improvement of the OTIS-3 and number of dogs in clinical remission at each time point.

resultsOTIS-3 decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) by 63 and 64% for the otic gel and by 63 and 61% for the suspension on D28 and D56 respectively. There was no significant difference between groups at any time point with regard to clinical success, pain, pruritus, overall assessments or otic cytology and culture. The treatment response was considered excellent or good by approximately three quarters of both the clinicians and Owners. Otitis recurrence at D56 was seen in 11% of both groups. Adverse events attributable to the ear medications were not noted.

conclusionsAdministering an otic gel twice at a one-week interval is an effective, safe and convenient way to treat canine otitis externa.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasoneDog DiseasesDogsDrug CombinationsGelsNaphthalenesOtitis ExternaTerbinafineThiamphenicolTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBetamethasoneDrug CombinationsflorfenicolGelsNaphthalenesTerbinafineThiamphenicolBetamethasoneClinical efficacyClinical safetyFlorfenicolOtic gelOtitis externaTerbinafine

Identifiers

PMID30305092
PMCPMC6180657
OpenAlexW2895866422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.