Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304938›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of hospice & palliative care2019

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Pain Management Manual for Hospice Providers to Support and Educate Family Caregivers.

Nai-Ching Chi, Soojeong Han, Emelia Barani, Debra Parker Oliver, Karla T Washington, Frances Marcus Lewis, Amy Walker, George Demiris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of hospice & palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a Practical Guide for Pediatric Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Enhancing Understanding and Informed Decision-Making.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nai-Ching ChiCollege of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-8034
Soojeong HanDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7130-818X
Emelia BaraniDepartment of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Debra Parker OliverDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Karla T WashingtonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-9524
Frances Marcus LewisDepartment of Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amy WalkerDepartment of Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
George DemirisDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-5829

Funding

A Problem Solving Intervention for Hospice CaregiversR01NR012213 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEMIRIS, GEORGE · 2011 to 2021
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR012213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregivers encounter many barriers to managing patients' pain in the home hospice setting. However, there are limited clinically applicable resources for hospice providers to help family caregivers identify and address these barriers.

aimTo develop a pain management manual for hospice providers to support family caregivers and conduct a preliminary providers' evaluation of the manual. DESIGN AND

participantsA pain management manual was developed and structured into 3 parts: (1) 5 common pain management case scenarios based on a secondary data analysis of a hospice clinical trial; (2) a list of suggested assessment questions and strategies for each case scenario was developed based on a caregiver framework; and (3) pain educational material was included from established clinical guidelines. The manual was vetted by 5 experts and then was evaluated by interviewing 25 hospice providers. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsThe hospice providers found that the manual could potentially serve as a reference in their practice and be a source for their continuing education. They suggested enhancing the clarity of the case scenarios and adding additional strategies to the manual. Moreover, they suggested expanding the paper-based version and developing a web-based platform to deliver the content would maximize its utility.

conclusionsThe manual has the potential to be integrated into routine hospice care to improve the quality of pain management.

Indexed as

Manuals as TopicAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPatient Preferencecaregiverseducationend-of-life carefamily caregivershospice carepain managementpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID30304938
PMCPMC12132048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.