Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304504›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2018

Smoking and Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States From 2015 to 2065: A Comparative Modeling Approach.

Jihyoun Jeon, Theodore R Holford, David T Levy, Eric J Feuer, Pianpian Cao, Jamie Tam, Lauren Clarke, John Clarke, Chung Yin Kong, Rafael Meza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jihyoun JeonUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J., P.C., J.T., R.M.).
Theodore R HolfordYale University, New Haven, Connecticut (T.R.H.).
David T LevyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC (D.T.L.).
Eric J FeuerNational Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (E.J.F.).
Pianpian CaoUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J., P.C., J.T., R.M.).
Jamie TamUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J., P.C., J.T., R.M.).
Lauren ClarkeCornerstone Systems Northwest, Lynden, Washington (L.C., J.C.).
John ClarkeCornerstone Systems Northwest, Lynden, Washington (L.C., J.C.).
Chung Yin KongMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (C.Y.K.).
Rafael MezaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan (J.J., P.C., J.T., R.M.).

Funding

Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Prevention and Control PoliciesU01CA199284 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, HOLFORD, THEODORE R · 2015 to 2019
$8.4M
Comparative Modeling of Lung Cancer Control PoliciesU01CA152956 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DE KONING, HARRY J, KONG, CHUNG YIN · 2010 to 2014
$7.4M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA152956NCI NIH HHS U01 CA199284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tobacco control efforts implemented in the United States since the 1960s have led to considerable reductions in smoking and smoking-related diseases, including lung cancer. Objective: To project reductions in tobacco use and lung cancer mortality from 2015 to 2065 due to existing tobacco control efforts. Design: Comparative modeling approach using 4 simulation models of the natural history of lung cancer that explicitly relate temporal smoking patterns to lung cancer rates. Setting: U.S. population, 1964 to 2065. Participants: Adults aged 30 to 84 years. Measurements: Models were developed using U.S. data on smoking (1964 to 2015) and lung cancer mortality (1969 to 2010). Each model projected lung cancer mortality by smoking status under the assumption that current decreases in smoking would continue into the future (status quo trends). Sensitivity analyses examined optimistic and pessimistic scenarios. Results: Under the assumption of continued decreases in smoking, age-adjusted lung cancer mortality was projected to decrease by 79% between 2015 and 2065. Concomitantly, and despite the expected growth, aging, and longer life expectancy of the U.S. population, the annual number of lung cancer deaths was projected to decrease from 135 000 to 50 000 (63% reduction). However, 4.4 million deaths from lung cancer are still projected to occur in the United States from 2015 to 2065, with about 20 million adults aged 30 to 84 years continuing to smoke in 2065. Limitation: Projections assumed no changes to tobacco control efforts in the future and did not explicitly consider the potential effect of lung cancer screening. Conclusion: Tobacco control efforts implemented since the 1960s will continue to reduce lung cancer rates well into the next half-century. Additional prevention and cessation efforts will be required to sustain and expand these gains to further reduce the lung cancer burden in the United States. Primary Funding Source: National Cancer Institute.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputer SimulationFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSmokingSmoking CessationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30304504
PMCPMC6242740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.