Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304462›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018

Accessibility to and Quality of Human Eye Tissue for Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of ARVO Members.

W Daniel Stamer, Andrew M Williams, Stephen Pflugfelder, Sarah E Coupland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Increased stiffness and flow resistance of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal in glaucomatous human eyes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

W Daniel StamerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States.
Andrew M WilliamsDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
Stephen PflugfelderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Baylor University College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States.
Sarah E CouplandMolecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess experiences of vision scientists concerning the availability, quality, and documentation of human eye tissue for research, and to elicit researcher feedback about the establishment of an online portal that pairs eye bank capabilities with researcher needs. Methods: An online survey was designed by a working group of vision scientists and eye bank personnel and sent to members of ARVO. Results: A total of 407 responses were received from across ARVO scientific sections and career stages. Most respondents report typically obtaining human eye tissue from their local eye bank (57%). Almost half (43%) find it "difficult" or "very difficult" to get an adequate quantity of human eye tissue for their research, and 88% report that they would use more human eye tissue if it were more accessible. Regarding tissue quality, 43% of respondents regularly limit the scope of their work due to difficulty obtaining tissue that meets their needs, and almost half (43%) indicate that they question their findings due to tissue quality at least sometimes. Respondents uniformly desire more documentation about ocular tissue than they typically receive. Most (62%) would "definitely" or "very likely" use a proposed online resource to facilitate connections between eye banks and researchers. Conclusions: Vision scientists report difficulty in obtaining human eye tissue with the quality and clinical documentation required for their research. An online portal may better help pair researcher needs and eye bank capabilities.

Indexed as

EyeBiomedical ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesEye BanksHumansOphthalmologySocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue and Organ Procurement

Identifiers

PMID30304462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.