ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018
Accessibility to and Quality of Human Eye Tissue for Research: A Cross-Sectional Survey of ARVO Members.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi‑omics insights into uveitis: From mechanisms to precision medicine (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of Transcript and Protein Abundance in Human Donor Retinas Support Extending Postmortem Interval From 12 to 18 Hours to Expand the Donor Pool for Biomedical Research.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Provision of human ocular tissue for biomedical research: trends, limitations, and potential solutions from an eye bank.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A tissue-engineered human trabecular meshwork hydrogel for advanced glaucoma disease modeling.Experimental eye research · 2021Article
- The Xiangya Ocular Tumor Bank: A Disease-Specific Biobank for Advancing Translational Research Into Ocular Tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Ocular Tissue for Research in Australia: Strategies for Potential Research Utility of Surplus and Transplant-Ineligible Deceased Donations.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Review
- The human capsular bag model of posterior capsule opacification.Eye (London, England) · 2020Article
- Increased stiffness and flow resistance of the inner wall of Schlemm's canal in glaucomatous human eyes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- The Utah Protocol for Postmortem Eye Phenotyping and Molecular Biochemical Analysis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019Article
- A standardized methodology for longitudinal assessment of corneal endothelial morphometry in eye banked corneas.Journal of biological methods · 2019Article
- A New Online Portal Will Match Eye Banks With Researchers Seeking Human Ocular Tissues.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess experiences of vision scientists concerning the availability, quality, and documentation of human eye tissue for research, and to elicit researcher feedback about the establishment of an online portal that pairs eye bank capabilities with researcher needs. Methods: An online survey was designed by a working group of vision scientists and eye bank personnel and sent to members of ARVO. Results: A total of 407 responses were received from across ARVO scientific sections and career stages. Most respondents report typically obtaining human eye tissue from their local eye bank (57%). Almost half (43%) find it "difficult" or "very difficult" to get an adequate quantity of human eye tissue for their research, and 88% report that they would use more human eye tissue if it were more accessible. Regarding tissue quality, 43% of respondents regularly limit the scope of their work due to difficulty obtaining tissue that meets their needs, and almost half (43%) indicate that they question their findings due to tissue quality at least sometimes. Respondents uniformly desire more documentation about ocular tissue than they typically receive. Most (62%) would "definitely" or "very likely" use a proposed online resource to facilitate connections between eye banks and researchers. Conclusions: Vision scientists report difficulty in obtaining human eye tissue with the quality and clinical documentation required for their research. An online portal may better help pair researcher needs and eye bank capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30304462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.