ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
LION LBD: a literature-based discovery system for cancer biology.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying Evidence for Competing Biomedical Hypotheses using Large Language Models and Bayesian Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ideometrics: a scientific approach to generating, evaluating, and prioritising ideas.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- SKiM-GPT: combining biomedical literature-based discovery with large language model hypothesis evaluation.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- AI-based mining of biomedical literature: Applications for drug repurposing for the treatment of dementia.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2025Article
- Enriched knowledge representation in biological fields: a case study of literature-based discovery in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- ENQUIRE automatically reconstructs, expands, and drives enrichment analysis of gene and Mesh co-occurrence networks from context-specific biomedical literature.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Predicting implicit concept embeddings for singular relationship discovery replication of closed literature-based discovery.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Article
- Mining impactful discoveries from the biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Learning to Rank Complex Biomedical Hypotheses for Accelerating Scientific Discovery.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024Article
- PubMed and beyond: biomedical literature search in the age of artificial intelligence.EBioMedicine · 2024Review
- Text mining for contexts and relationships in cancer genomics literature.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A new model construction based on the knowledge graph for mining elite polyphenotype genes in crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The underuse of AI in the health sector: Opportunity costs, success stories, risks and recommendations.Health and technology · 2024Review
- Serial KinderMiner (SKiM) discovers and annotates biomedical knowledge using co-occurrence and transformer models.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Literature-based discovery: addressing the issue of the subpar evaluation methodology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A survey on clinical natural language processing in the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2022.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- A haplotype-resolved genome assembly of the Nile rat facilitates exploration of the genetic basis of diabetes.BMC biology · 2022Article
- An automatic hypothesis generation for plausible linkage between xanthium and diabetes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe overwhelming size and rapid growth of the biomedical literature make it impossible for scientists to read all studies related to their work, potentially leading to missed connections and wasted time and resources. Literature-based discovery (LBD) aims to alleviate these issues by identifying implicit links between disjoint parts of the literature. While LBD has been studied in depth since its introduction three decades ago, there has been limited work making use of recent advances in biomedical text processing methods in LBD.
resultsWe present LION LBD, a literature-based discovery system that enables researchers to navigate published information and supports hypothesis generation and testing. The system is built with a particular focus on the molecular biology of cancer using state-of-the-art machine learning and natural language processing methods, including named entity recognition and grounding to domain ontologies covering a wide range of entity types and a novel approach to detecting references to the hallmarks of cancer in text. LION LBD implements a broad selection of co-occurrence based metrics for analyzing the strength of entity associations, and its design allows real-time search to discover indirect associations between entities in a database of tens of millions of publications while preserving the ability of users to explore each mention in its original context in the literature. Evaluations of the system demonstrate its ability to identify undiscovered links and rank relevant concepts highly among potential connections. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The LION LBD system is available via a web-based user interface and a programmable API, and all components of the system are made available under open licenses from the project home page http://lbd.lionproject.net. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.