Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Commercialization of obstetric and neonatal care in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A study of the variability in user fees in Lubumbashi, 2014.

Abel Mukengeshayi Ntambue, Françoise Kaj Malonga, Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet, Tabitha Mpoyi Ilunga, Angel Nkola Musau, Charles Matungulu Matungulu, Karen D Cowgill, Philippe Donnen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abel Mukengeshayi NtambueUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-2129
Françoise Kaj MalongaUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.
Michèle Dramaix-WilmetCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, École de Santé Publique Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Tabitha Mpoyi IlungaUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.
Angel Nkola MusauUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.
Charles Matungulu MatunguluUnité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la mère, du nouveau-né et de l'enfant, École de Santé Publique, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, RDC.
Karen D CowgillSchool of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington Tacoma, and Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Philippe DonnenCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, École de Santé Publique Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
University of Lubumbashi · CDUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity of Washington Tacoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn the Democratic Republic of the Congo, insufficient state financing of the health system produced weak progress toward targets of Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5. In Lubumbashi, almost all women pay out-of-pocket for obstetric and neonatal care. As no standard pricing system has been implemented, there is great variation in payments related to childbirth between health facilities and even within the same facility. This work investigates the determinants of this variation.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study including women from admission through discharge at 92 maternity wards in Lubumbashi in March 2014. The women's payments were collected and validated by triangulating interviews of new mothers and nurses with document review. We studied payments related to delivery from the perspective of women delivering. The total was the sum of the payments linked to seeking and accessing care and transport of the woman and companion. The determinants were assessed by multilevel regression.

resultsMedian payments for delivery varied by type: for an uncomplicated vaginal delivery, US$45 (range, US$17-260); for a complicated vaginal delivery US$60 (US$16-304); and for a Cesarean section, US$338 (US$163-782). Vaginal delivery was more expensive at health centers than in general referral hospitals or polyclinics. Cesarean sections done in corporate polyclinics and hospitals were more expensive than those done in the general referral hospitals. Referral of delivering women, use of more highly trained personnel, and a longer stay in the maternity unit contributed to higher expenses. A vaginal delivery in the private sector was more cost-effective than in the public sector.

conclusionTo guarantee universal coverage of high-quality care, we suggest that the government and funders in DRC support health insurance and risk pool initiatives, and introduce and institutionalize free mother and infant care.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresAdolescentAdultCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDemocratic Republic of the CongoFees and ChargesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant CareInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthInterviews as TopicLength of Stay

Identifiers

PMID30304060
PMCPMC6179261
OpenAlexW2897357636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.