Observational studyPloS one2018
Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit.
Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiovascular Aging and Damage in Patients with Iron Overload.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Evaluation of physiology-based models for noninvasive blood pressure estimation using pulse arrival time.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Multimodal System for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Monitoring Using ECG, PCG, and PPG Signal Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beat-to-beat variability of aortic pulse wave velocity: implications for aortic stiffness measurements.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- A method for blood pressure hydrostatic pressure correction using wearable inertial sensors and deep learning.Npj biosensing · 2025Article
- Are Wearable Photoplethysmogram-Based Heart Rate Variability Measures Equivalent to Electrocardiogram? A Simulation Study.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Article
- The pre-ejection period is a highly stress dependent parameter of paramount importance for pulse-wave-velocity based applications.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Pulse transit time estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity and blood pressure using machine learning and simulated training data.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Comparison between pulse wave velocities measured using Complior and measured using Biopac.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVascular transit time (VTT) is the propagation time of a pulse wave through an artery; it is a measure for arterial stiffness. Because reliable non-invasive VTT measurements are difficult, as an alternative we measure pulse transit time (PTT). PTT is defined as the time between the R-wave on electrocardiogram and arrival of the resulting pulse wave in a distal location measured with photoplethysmography (PPG). The time between electrical activation of the ventricles and the resulting pulse wave after opening of the aortic valve is called the pre-ejection period (PEP), a component of PTT. The aim of this study was to estimate the variability of PEP at rest, to establish how accurate PTT is as approximation of VTT.
methodsPTT was measured and PEP was assessed with echocardiography (gold standard) in three groups of 20 volunteers: 1) a control group without cardiovascular disease aged <50 years and 2) aged >50 years, and 3) a group with cardiovascular risk factors, defined as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney failure and diabetes mellitus.
resultsPer group, the mean PEP was: 1) 58.5 ± 13.0 ms, 2) 52.4 ± 11.9 ms, and 3) 57.6 ± 11.6 ms. However, per individual the standard deviation was much smaller, i.e. 1) 2.0-5.9 ms, 2) 2.8-5.1 ms, and 3) 1.6-12.0 ms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean PEP of the 3 groups (p = 0.236).
conclusionIn conclusion, the intra-individual variability of PEP is small. A change in PTT in a person at rest is most probably the result of a change in VTT rather than of PEP. Thus, PTT at rest is an easy, non-invasive and accurate approximation of VTT for monitoring arterial stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.