Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304059›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Small intra-individual variability of the pre-ejection period justifies the use of pulse transit time as approximation of the vascular transit.

Minke C Kortekaas, Marit H N van Velzen, Frank Grüne, Sjoerd P Niehof, Robert J Stolker, Frank J P M Huygen

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Minke C KortekaasDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5003-7045
Marit H N van VelzenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank GrüneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Sjoerd P NiehofDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert J StolkerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank J P M HuygenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular transit time (VTT) is the propagation time of a pulse wave through an artery; it is a measure for arterial stiffness. Because reliable non-invasive VTT measurements are difficult, as an alternative we measure pulse transit time (PTT). PTT is defined as the time between the R-wave on electrocardiogram and arrival of the resulting pulse wave in a distal location measured with photoplethysmography (PPG). The time between electrical activation of the ventricles and the resulting pulse wave after opening of the aortic valve is called the pre-ejection period (PEP), a component of PTT. The aim of this study was to estimate the variability of PEP at rest, to establish how accurate PTT is as approximation of VTT.

methodsPTT was measured and PEP was assessed with echocardiography (gold standard) in three groups of 20 volunteers: 1) a control group without cardiovascular disease aged <50 years and 2) aged >50 years, and 3) a group with cardiovascular risk factors, defined as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, kidney failure and diabetes mellitus.

resultsPer group, the mean PEP was: 1) 58.5 ± 13.0 ms, 2) 52.4 ± 11.9 ms, and 3) 57.6 ± 11.6 ms. However, per individual the standard deviation was much smaller, i.e. 1) 2.0-5.9 ms, 2) 2.8-5.1 ms, and 3) 1.6-12.0 ms, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean PEP of the 3 groups (p = 0.236).

conclusionIn conclusion, the intra-individual variability of PEP is small. A change in PTT in a person at rest is most probably the result of a change in VTT rather than of PEP. Thus, PTT at rest is an easy, non-invasive and accurate approximation of VTT for monitoring arterial stiffness.

Indexed as

Vascular StiffnessAdultAgedAortic ValveBiological Variation, IndividualCardiovascular DiseasesElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotoplethysmographyProspective StudiesPulse Wave AnalysisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID30304059
PMCPMC6179208
OpenAlexW2897597361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.