Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Educational outcomes of a new curriculum on interproximal oral prophylaxis for dental students.

Denis Bourgeois, Ina Saliasi, Claude Dussart, Juan Carlos Llodra, Delphine Tardivo, Laurent Laforest, Manuel Bravo, Stéphane Viennot, Bruno Foti, Florence Carrouel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of Oral Hygiene-Related Mobile Apps for Children in Sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Oral Health Attitudes among Preclinical and Clinical Dental Students in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Denis BourgeoisLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA4129, University Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-2512
Ina SaliasiLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA4129, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Claude DussartLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA4129, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Juan Carlos LlodraFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Delphine TardivoLaboratory Anthropology, Health Law, and Medical Ethics, UMR 7268, University Aix Marseille 2, Marseille, France.
Laurent LaforestFaculty of Dental Medicine, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Manuel BravoFaculty of Dental Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Stéphane ViennotLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA4129, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bruno FotiLaboratory Anthropology, Health Law, and Medical Ethics, UMR 7268, University Aix Marseille 2, Marseille, France.
Florence CarrouelLaboratory Systemic Health Care, EA4129, University Lyon, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a preclinical oral prophylaxis education program by examining the effectiveness of the teaching module on changes to the students' attitudes towards their individual hygiene behaviors with interdental brushes (IDBs).

methodsAs being part of a new didactic program on oral interproximal prophylaxis, all preclinical third-year students (n = 96) enrolled in the 2014/15 academic year received theoretical, preclinical, and clinical lessons on interproximal prophylaxis. The evaluation of educational outcomes was linked to observed changes in students' hygiene behaviors using interdental brushes. Knowledge, skills, attitudes, satisfaction, competence and performance were also explored. The evaluation interviews were recorded at each recall, i.e., 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year after baseline.

resultsMotivation to use IDBs is clearly related to the perception of the effectiveness of the brushes and the perception of bleeding reduction. At one week, 89.6% of subjects reported using IDBs. Individual use decreased significantly from one week to one month (-26%, p = 0.006) while a non-significant upward trend occurred between one month and three months. Among students reporting usage of IDBs at 1 year (20.8%), only 2.0% used IDBs daily. Most students would recommend IDBs to other people at the beginning (69.8%). However, this share dropped to 50% at 3 months. IDB-users prescribed more than non-users. DISCUSSION AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: The implementation of a module on interdental hygiene practices in the oral health program is strongly recommended. However, corrective measures should be considered regarding the organization and frequency of recall periods in order to improve the performance of the curriculum.

Indexed as

CurriculumDental Devices, Home CareEducation, DentalOral HealthStudents, DentalAcademic SuccessBiofilmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHemorrhageHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMotivationTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30304017
PMCPMC6179232
OpenAlexW2897630582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.