Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30304014›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Human umbilical cord blood plasma as an alternative to animal sera for mesenchymal stromal cells in vitro expansion - A multicomponent metabolomic analysis.

A R Caseiro, G Ivanova, S S Pedrosa, M V Branquinho, P Georgieva, P P Barbosa, J D Santos, R Magalhães, P Teixeira, T Pereira and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Peripheral Nerve Injury Treatments and Advances: One Health Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dental pulp stem cells and BonelikeRegenerative biomaterials · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A R CaseiroDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1143-2461
G IvanovaREQUIMTE- LAQV, Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto, Portugal.
S S PedrosaDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, Porto, Portugal.
M V BranquinhoDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1328-464X
P GeorgievaDepartment of Electronics Telecommunications and Informatics, IEETA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
P P BarbosaBiosckin, Molecular and Cell Therapies S.A., Laboratório Criovida, TecMaia, Rua Engenheiro Frederico Ulrich 2650, Moreira da Maia, Portugal.
J D SantosREQUIMTE/LAQV-U. Porto-Porto/Portugal, Departamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e Materiais, Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, s/n, Porto, Portugal.
R MagalhãesUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Arquiteto Lobão Vital 172, Porto, Portugal.
P TeixeiraUniversidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Rua Arquiteto Lobão Vital 172, Porto, Portugal.
T PereiraDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1050-9268
A C MaurícioDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-9363
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal Stromal cells (MSCs) have a potential role in cell-based therapies. Foetal bovine serum (FBS) is used to supplement the basal cell culture medium but presents several disadvantages and risks. Other alternatives have been studied, including human umbilical cord blood plasma (hUCBP), aiming at the development of xeno-free culturing protocols. A comparative characterization of multicomponent metabolic composition of hUCBP and commercial FBS based on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analysis was performed. The analysis of 1H-NMR spectra revealed both similarities and differences between the two proposed supplements. Similar metabolites (amino acids, glucose, lipids and nucleotides) were found in the hUCBP and FBS NMR spectra. The results show that the major difference between the metabolic profiles of the two proposed supplements are due to the significantly higher levels of glucose and lower levels of lactate, glutamate, alanine and branched chain amino acids in hUCBP. Similar or slightly different levels of important proteinogenic amino acids, as well as of nucleotides, lipids were found in the hUCBP and FBS. In order to validate it's suitability for cell culture, umbilical cord-MSCs (UC-MSCs) and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were expanded using hUCBP. In both hMSCs, in vitro culture with hUCBP supplementation presented similar to improved metabolic performances when compared to FBS. The two cell types tested expressed different optimum hUCBP percentage content. For DPSCs, the optimum hUCBP content was 6% and for UC-MSCs, 4%. Cultured hMSCs displayed no changes in senescence indicators, as well as maintained characteristic surface marker's expression. FBS substitution was associated with an increase in early apoptosis events, in a dose dependent manner, as well as to slight up- and down-regulation of targeted gene's expression. Tri-lineage differentiation capacity was also influenced by the substitution of FBS by hUCBP.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCulture MediaDental PulpHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMesenchymal Stem CellsMetabolomicsProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopySerumStem CellsUmbilical CordCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID30304014
PMCPMC6179201
OpenAlexW2897531193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.