Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303989›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

New evidence of megafaunal bone damage indicates late colonization of Madagascar.

Atholl Anderson, Geoffrey Clark, Simon Haberle, Tom Higham, Malgosia Nowak-Kemp, Amy Prendergast, Chantal Radimilahy, Lucien M Rakotozafy, Ramilisonina, Jean-Luc Schwenninger and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic perspectives on human dispersals during the Holocene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dialects of Madagascar.PloS one · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Atholl AndersonDepartment of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra ACT Australia.
Geoffrey ClarkDepartment of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra ACT Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9055-655X
Simon HaberleDepartment of Archaeology and Natural History, Australian National University, Canberra ACT Australia.
Tom HighamORAU, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Malgosia Nowak-KempUniversity Museum of Natural History, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amy PrendergastSchool of Geography, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC, Australia.
Chantal RadimilahyMusée d'Art et d'Archaéologie, The University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo BP, Isoraka, Madagascar.
Lucien M RakotozafyMusée d'Art et d'Archaéologie, The University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo BP, Isoraka, Madagascar.
RamilisoninaMusée d'Art et d'Archaéologie, The University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo BP, Isoraka, Madagascar.
Jean-Luc SchwenningerORAU, Research Laboratory for Archaeology, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Malika Virah-SawmyPlant Conservation Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Aaron CamensEcology and Evolution Group, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide SA, Australia.
Australian National University · AUUniversity of Antananarivo · MGOxford Archaeology · GBFlinders University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimated period in which human colonization of Madagascar began has expanded recently to 5000-1000 y B.P., six times its range in 1990, prompting revised thinking about early migration sources, routes, maritime capability and environmental changes. Cited evidence of colonization age includes anthropogenic palaeoecological data 2500-2000 y B.P., megafaunal butchery marks 4200-1900 y B.P. and OSL dating to 4400 y B.P. of the Lakaton'i Anja occupation site. Using large samples of newly-excavated bone from sites in which megafaunal butchery was earlier dated >2000 y B.P. we find no butchery marks until ~1200 y B.P., with associated sedimentary and palynological data of initial human impact about the same time. Close analysis of the Lakaton'i Anja chronology suggests the site dates <1500 y B.P. Diverse evidence from bone damage, palaeoecology, genomic and linguistic history, archaeology, introduced biota and seafaring capability indicate initial human colonization of Madagascar 1350-1100 y B.P.

Indexed as

FossilsAnimalsArchaeologyArtiodactylaBone and BonesEupleridaeHistory, AncientHuman MigrationHumansMadagascarRadiometric DatingStrepsirhini

Identifiers

PMID30303989
PMCPMC6179221
OpenAlexW2896895753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.