Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303970›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).

Jennifer N Ward, Joseph W Hinton, Kristina L Johannsen, Melissa L Karlin, Karl V Miller, Michael J Chamberlain

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer N WardWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Joseph W HintonWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2602-0400
Kristina L JohannsenWildlife Resources Division, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Social Circle, Georgia, United States of America.
Melissa L KarlinDepartment of Physics and Environmental Sciences, St. Mary's University, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Karl V MillerWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
Michael J ChamberlainWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.
University of Georgia · USGeorgia Department of Natural Resources · USSt. Mary's University, Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure reproductive success, Canis species establish contiguous mosaics of territories in suitable habitats to partition space and defend limiting resources. Consequently, Canis species can exert strong effects on prey populations locally because of their year-round maintenance of territories. We assessed prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans) by sampling scats from within known territories in southeastern Alabama and the Savannah River area of Georgia and South Carolina. We accounted for the size and habitat composition of coyote home ranges to investigate the influence of space use, vegetation density, and habitat type on coyote diets. Coyote use of prey was influenced by a combination of mean monthly temperature, home range size, vegetation density, and hardwood forests. For example, coyote use of adult white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) was associated with cooler months and smaller home ranges, whereas use of rabbits (Sylvilagus spp.) was associated with cooler months, larger home ranges, and less vegetation density. Coyotes in our study relied primarily on nutritionally superior mammalian prey and supplemented their diet with fruit when available, as their use of mammalian prey did not appreciably decrease with increasing use of fruit. We suggest that differential use of prey by coyotes is influenced by habitat heterogeneity within their home ranges, and prey-switching behaviors may stabilize local interactions between coyotes and their food resources to permit stable year-round territories. Given that habitat composition affects coyote prey use, future studies should also incorporate effects of habitat composition on coyote distribution and abundance to further identify coyote influences on prey communities.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoyotesDeerEcosystemHoming BehaviorMammalsPredatory BehaviorRabbitsSeasons

Identifiers

PMID30303970
PMCPMC6179196
OpenAlexW2897282631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.