Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303927›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2019

Tissue Expander Complications Do Not Preclude a Second Successful Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Louis H Poppler, Minh-Bao Mundschenk, Andrew Linkugel, Ema Zubovic, Utku C Dolen, Terence M Myckatyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Safe and Efficient Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louis H PopplerFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Minh-Bao MundschenkFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Andrew LinkugelFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Ema ZubovicFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Utku C DolenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Terence M MyckatynFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine.
Yahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA190194 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GRAHAM A. COLDITZ, AIMEE S JAMES · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001NCI NIH HHS T32 CA190194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplant-based breast reconstruction is the most common method of breast reconstruction in the United States, but the outcomes of subsequent implant-based reconstruction after a tissue expander complication are rarely studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term incidence of implant loss in patents with a previous tissue expander complication.

methodsThis is a retrospective review of the long-term outcomes of all patients with tissue expander complications at a large academic medical center from 2003 to 2013. Patients with subsequent tissue expander or implant complications were compared to those with no further complications to assess risk factors for additional complications or reconstructive failure.

resultsOne hundred sixty-two women were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 3.1 years. Forty-eight women (30 percent) went on to undergo a second tissue expander or implant placement. They did not differ from women who went on to autologous reconstruction or no further reconstruction. Of these, 34 women (71 percent) had no further complications and 38 women (79 percent) had a successful implant-based reconstruction at final follow-up. There were no patient or surgical factors significantly associated with a second complication or implant loss.

conclusionsFollowing tissue expander complications, it is reasonable to offer women a second attempt at tissue expansion and implant placement. This study demonstrates that long-term success rates are high, and there are no definitive patient or surgical factors that preclude a second attempt at implant-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantsAcademic Medical CentersAdultBreast ImplantationBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMastectomyMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureReoperationRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30303927
PMCPMC6310090
OpenAlexW4240421221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.