Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303916›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2018

Survival of Women With Type I and II Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Detected by Ultrasound Screening.

John R van Nagell, Brian T Burgess, Rachel W Miller, Lauren Baldwin, Christopher P DeSimone, Frederick R Ueland, Bin Huang, Quan Chen, Richard J Kryscio, Edward J Pavlik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers and Strategies for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John R van NagellDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Department of Biostatistics, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource Facility, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center-Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, Kentucky.
Brian T Burgess
Rachel W Miller
Lauren Baldwin
Christopher P DeSimone
Frederick R Ueland
Bin Huang
Quan Chen
Richard J Kryscio
Edward J Pavlik
Markey Cancer Center · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the effect of ultrasound screening on stage at detection and long-term disease-specific survival of at-risk women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

methodsEligibility included all asymptomatic women 50 years of age or older and women 25 years of age or older with a documented family history of ovarian cancer. From 1987 to 2017, 46,101 women received annual ultrasound screening in a prospective cohort trial. Women with a persisting abnormal screen underwent tumor morphology indexing, serum biomarker analysis, and surgery.

resultsSeventy-one invasive epithelial ovarian cancers and 17 epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential were detected. No women with a low malignant potential tumor experienced recurrent disease. Stage distribution for screen-detected invasive epithelial ovarian cancers was stage I-30 (42%), stage II-15 (21%), stage III-26 (37%), and stage IV-0 (0%). Follow-up varied from 9.2 months to 27 years (mean 7.9 years). Disease-specific survival at 5, 10, and 20 years for women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer detected by screening was 86±4%, 68±7%, and 65±7%, respectively, vs 45±2%, 31±2%, and 19±3%, respectively, for unscreened women with clinically detected ovarian cancer from the same geographic area who were treated at the same institution by the same treatment protocols (P<.001). Twenty-seven percent of screen-detected malignancies were type I and 73% were type II. The disease-specific survival of women with type I and type II screen-detected tumors was significantly higher than that of women with clinically detected type I and type II tumors and was related directly to earlier stage at detection.

conclusionAnnual ultrasound screening of at-risk asymptomatic women was associated with lower stage at detection and increased 5-, 10-, and 20-year disease-specific survival of women with both type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer. CLINICAL

trial registrationOnCore Clinical Trials Management System, NCI-2013-01954.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAsymptomatic DiseasesCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCost-Benefit AnalysisCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresEarly Detection of CancerFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedCA-125 AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30303916
PMCPMC9373050
OpenAlexW2896134719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.