Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303516›Full record

Trial reportCancer2018

NCI 8628: A randomized phase 2 study of ziv-aflibercept and high-dose interleukin 2 or high-dose interleukin 2 alone for inoperable stage III or IV melanoma.

Ahmad A Tarhini, Paul Frankel, Christopher Ruel, Marc S Ernstoff, Timothy M Kuzel, Theodore F Logan, Nikhil I Khushalani, Hussein A Tawbi, Kim A Margolin, Sanjay Awasthi and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hypoxia-dependent drivers of melanoma progression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  13. (Im)maturity in Tumor Ecosystem.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmad A TarhiniUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paul FrankelCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Christopher RuelCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Marc S ErnstoffRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Timothy M KuzelRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Theodore F LoganIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Nikhil I KhushalaniMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Hussein A TawbiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Kim A MargolinCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Sanjay AwasthiCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California.
Lisa H ButterfieldUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
David McDermottBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alice ChenCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Primo N LaraUniversity of California at Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
John M KirkwoodUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USRush University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Phase I Molecular and Clinical Pharmacodynamic Trials ETCTNUM1CA186717 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI A. Dimitrios Colevas, Alexey V. Danilov · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
NCI ET-CTN with Phase i Emphasis at UPCIUM1CA186690 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD, Farshid Dayyani · 2014 to 2026
$9.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186690NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterleukin 2 (IL-2) is a growth factor for T and natural killer cells, promotes proinflammatory cytokines, and can lead to durable responses in patients with melanoma. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and modulates host innate and adaptive immunity. High VEGF levels were found to be associated with nonresponse to IL-2. Ziv-aflibercept may deplete VEGF and thereby enhance antitumor T-cell responses, thus supporting a combination immunotherapeutic strategy with IL-2.

methodsNCI 8628 was a phase 2 trial of ziv-aflibercept and IL-2 (arm A) versus IL-2 alone (arm B) randomized at 2:1, respectively. Eligible patients had inoperable American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or stage IV melanoma. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsA total of 89 patients were enrolled and 84 patients were treated. The median follow-up was 41.4 months. Among treated patients (55 patients in arm A and 29 patients in arm B), PFS was significantly improved in favor of arm A, with a median of 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.1-8.7 months) versus 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.6-3.5 months) (P<.001). No significant difference was noted with regard to overall survival, with a median of 26.9 months (95% CI, 14.4-63.6 months) for arm A and 24.2 months (95% CI, 11.3-36.4 months) for arm B. The response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST]) was 22% in arm A (4 complete responses [CRs] and 8 partial responses [PRs]) and 17% in arm B (1 CR and 4 PRs). Stable disease or PR or CR was noted in 65% of patients in arm A and 48% of patients in arm B. The combination was found to be superior to monotherapy in patients with high and low levels of serum VEGF and VEGF receptor 2. Adverse events were consistent with the expected profiles of monotherapy with IL-2 and ziv-aflibercept.

conclusionsZiv-aflibercept and IL-2 were found to significantly improve PFS compared with IL-2 alone, thereby meeting the primary endpoint of the current study. These findings support further study of immunotherapeutic combination strategies involving VEGF inhibitors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHumansInterleukin-2MaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2afliberceptInterleukin-2KDR protein, humanReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorRecombinant Fusion ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2VEGFA protein, humanangiogenesisimmunotherapyinterleukin 2melanomavascular endothelial growth factorziv-aflibercept

Identifiers

PMID30303516
PMCPMC6504933
OpenAlexW2896375815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.