Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30303127›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2018

Use of modern imaging methods to facilitate trials of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging Group.

Frédéric E Lecouvet, Daniela E Oprea-Lager, Yan Liu, Piet Ost, Luc Bidaut, Laurence Collette, Christophe M Deroose, Karolien Goffin, Ken Herrmann, Otto S Hoekstra and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. PET/MRI in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Phase III Study ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. [The Journal of urology · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Oligometastatic disease in pancreatic cancer: is there a role for curative-intent surgery? A narrative review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Frédéric E LecouvetDepartment of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: frederic.lecouvet@uclouvain.be.
Daniela E Oprea-LagerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yan LiuEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Piet OstDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Luc BidautCollege of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Laurence ColletteEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Christophe M DerooseNuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Karolien GoffinNuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ken HerrmannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany.
Otto S HoekstraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Gem KramerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Yolande LievensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Egesta LopciNuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
David PasquierAcademic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille, Lille University, Lille, France.
Lars J PetersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jean-Noël TalbotDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Helle ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Bertrand TombalDepartment of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Nandita M deSouzaCancer Research UK Imaging Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden Hospital-Sutton, UK.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAalborg University Hospital · DKCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer · BEGhent University Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BECancer Research UK · GBCentre de Recherche en Informatique · FREssen University Hospital · DEHumanitas University · ITSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C1060/A10334Cancer Research UK C1060/A16464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oligometastatic disease represents a clinical and anatomical manifestation between localised and polymetastatic disease. In prostate cancer, as with other cancers, recognition of oligometastatic disease enables focal, metastasis-directed therapies. These therapies potentially shorten or postpone the use of systemic treatment and can delay further metastatic progression, thus increasing overall survival. Metastasis-directed therapies require imaging methods that definitively recognise oligometastatic disease to validate their efficacy and reliably monitor response, particularly so that morbidity associated with inappropriately treating disease subsequently recognised as polymetastatic can be avoided. In this Review, we assess imaging methods used to identify metastatic prostate cancer at first diagnosis, at biochemical recurrence, or at the castration-resistant stage. Standard imaging methods recommended by guidelines have insufficient diagnostic accuracy for reliably diagnosing oligometastatic disease. Modern imaging methods that use PET-CT with tumour-specific radiotracers (choline or prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand), and increasingly whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging, allow earlier and more precise identification of metastases. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group suggests clinical algorithms to integrate modern imaging methods into the care pathway at the various stages of prostate cancer to identify oligometastatic disease. The EORTC proposes clinical trials that use modern imaging methods to evaluate the benefits of metastasis-directed therapies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisPredictive Value of TestsProgression-Free SurvivalProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID30303127
OpenAlexW2895455649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.