Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302946›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

The role of tissue and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in stages I to III of colorectal cancer-A retrospective cohort study.

Guojun Tong, Wei Xu, Guiyang Zhang, Jian Liu, Zhaozheng Zheng, Yan Chen, Pingping Niu, Xuting Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. CeOMikrochimica acta · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guojun TongDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8641
Wei XuPathological Department, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Guiyang ZhangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Jian LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Zhaozheng ZhengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Yan ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Pingping NiuCentral Laboratory, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.
Xuting XuCentral Laboratory, Huzhou Central Hospital, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTissue carcinoembryonic antigen (t-CEA) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (s-CEA) expression profiles are the most useful tumor markers for the diagnosis and evaluation of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide; however, their roles in CRC progression remain controversial. This study aimed to compare the prognostic values of both s-CEA and t-CEA in CRC.

methodsA total of 517 patients from January 2006 to December 2010 with stages I-III CRC were retrospectively examined, with 5-year postoperative follow-up and death as end-points. T-CEA expression, s-CEA expression, and clinical pathological parameters were inputted into the SPSS 21.0 software. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of patients in different tumor node metastasis (TNM) stages based on t-CEA and s-CEA expression.

resultsTumor differentiation and the number of positive lymph node harvests were significantly different among the t-CEA groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.002); however, clinicopathological features showed no significant difference. The groups with high s-CEA and t-CEA expression had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with low s-CEA (P = 0.021) and t-CEA (P < 0.01) expression, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that t-CEA was an independent prognostic factor in CRC (P < 0.001), but s-CEA was not (P = 0.339). The 5-year disease-free survival rates among the t-CEA groups were significantly different in stages I, II, and III of CRC (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001), whereas in the s-CEA groups, this difference was observed only in stage III (P = 0.014).

conclusionThis study shows that postoperative t-CEA expression is an independent factor associated with poorer CRC prognosis and has a higher prognostic value than that of preoperative s-CEA expression.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoembryonic AntigenColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCarcinoembryonic Antigencarcinoembryonic antigencolorectal carcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID30302946
PMCPMC6246925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.