ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2018
Defining predictive factors for reproductive output in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).
Article in American journal of primatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unconventional animal models of Alzheimer's disease and aging: key insights from the UAMAA 2026 conference.Lab animal · 2026Article
- Retrospective Analysis of the Effectiveness and Reversibility of Long-Acting Contraception Etonogestrel (ImplanonAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Ethical and Welfare Implications of Genetically Altered Non-Human Primates for Biomedical Research.Journal of applied animal ethics research · 2020Article
- Defining predictive factors for reproductive output in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).American journal of primatology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) demonstrate variations in reproductive output, not only in terms of total reproductive output during a lifetime but also in litter size per parturition. The present study explores factors, such as parents' litter size, parturition number, maternal body weight at conception and maternal age, which may account for this variation. A retrospective analysis of clinical records of a captive breeding colony was conducted over a 9-year period yielding reproductive summaries of 26 dams and 22 sires producing a total of 115 litters. Dams born from litters of ≤2 (N = 20) more often produced litters of ≤2, whereas dams born from litters of >2 (N = 6) more often produced litters of >2 (p < 0.05). The dams' maternal body weight at the time of conception had also a significant effect on subsequent litter size. In addition, the chance of triplets was higher after the second parturition. Maternal age, interbirth interval, and season of birth had no effect on litter size. Factors relating to the sire had a negligible effect on the size of the litter. Multivariate statistical modeling revealed that the dams' original litter size, maternal bodyweight at conception and parturition number are determining factors for the number of babies per litter. This study identified factors determining marmoset litter size, some of which (maternal litter size) are novel to this study and were not reported previously. Further exploration of the potential role of maternal litter size as a determinant of the litter sizes produced by marmoset breeders is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.