Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302607›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2019

Comparative evaluation of autofluorescence imaging and histopathological investigation for oral potentially malignant disorders in Taiwan.

Tien-En Chiang, Yu-Chun Lin, Yu-Hsuan Li, Chi-Tsung Wu, Chin-Shan Kuo, Yuan-Wu Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Autofluorescence Image-Guided Endoscopy in the Management of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tien-En ChiangDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No.325, Cheng-Kung Rd., Sec.2, Neihu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yu-Chun LinDepartment of pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yu-Hsuan LiDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No.325, Cheng-Kung Rd., Sec.2, Neihu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chi-Tsung WuDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No.325, Cheng-Kung Rd., Sec.2, Neihu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chin-Shan KuoDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No.325, Cheng-Kung Rd., Sec.2, Neihu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yuan-Wu ChenDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, No.325, Cheng-Kung Rd., Sec.2, Neihu, 114, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. h6183@yahoo.com.tw.

Funding

Ministry of National Defense, Republic of China No. MAB-106-090National Science Council No. MOST 106-2314-B-016-021-MY3Tri-Service General Hospital TSGH-C106-004-006-008-S05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAutofluorescence imaging is gaining popularity as an adjunctive test for oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). This study evaluated the efficacy of autofluorescence imaging based on the current standard oral mucosal disorder checklist in Taiwan. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 126 patients suspected to have mucosal disorders at the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, were enrolled. Following a conventional oral examination by using the oral mucosal disorder checklist and an autofluorescence imaging examination, all participants underwent histopathological examination to access epithelial dysplasia.

resultsAmong 126 patients, 68 patients were diagnosis as having an OPMD and 63 having epithelial dysplasia. Autofluorescence imaging exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, positivity predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 77.94%, 35.42%, 63.10%, 53.13%, and 60.34%, respectively, for OPMD and of 88.89%, 43.86%, 63.64%, 78.13%, and 67.50%, respectively, for epithelial dysplasia. After the exclusion of 48 non-OPMD cases according to the checklist, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of autofluorescence imaging became 87.50%, 72.73%, 94.23%, 53.33%, and 85.07%, respectively, for epithelial dysplasia.

conclusionThe efficacy of epithelial dysplasia identification and OPMD risk assessment can be increased after the exclusion of the non-OPMD cases through autofluorescence imaging. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Autofluorescence imaging is a useful adjunct that can assist specialists in assessing OPMD patients prone to dysplasia without compromising patient care.

Indexed as

Optical ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsSensitivity and SpecificityTaiwanAutofluorescenceOral potentially malignant disordersSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.