Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302531›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2019

A-to-I mRNA editing in fungi: occurrence, function, and evolution.

Zhuyun Bian, Yajia Ni, Jin-Rong Xu, Huiquan Liu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Sexual stage-specific A-to-I mRNA editing is mediated by tRNA-editing enzymes in fungi.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhuyun BianDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Yajia NiState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Purdue-NWAFU Joint Research Center, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.
Jin-Rong XuDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Huiquan LiuState Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Purdue-NWAFU Joint Research Center, College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China. liuhuiquan@nwsuaf.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-845X
Purdue University West Lafayette · USNorthwest A&F University · CNNorth West Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A-to-I RNA editing is an important post-transcriptional modification that converts adenosine (A) to inosine (I) in RNA molecules via hydrolytic deamination. Although editing of mRNAs catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism in metazoans, organisms outside the animal kingdom lacking ADAR orthologs were thought to lack A-to-I mRNA editing. However, recent discoveries of genome-wide A-to-I mRNA editing during the sexual stage of the wheat scab fungus Fusarium graminearum, model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, Sordaria macrospora, and an early diverging filamentous ascomycete Pyronema confluens indicated that A-to-I mRNA editing is likely an evolutionarily conserved feature in filamentous ascomycetes. More importantly, A-to-I mRNA editing has been demonstrated to play crucial roles in different sexual developmental processes and display distinct tissue- or development-specific regulation. Contrary to that in animals, the majority of fungal RNA editing events are non-synonymous editing, which were shown to be generally advantageous and favored by positive selection. Many non-synonymous editing sites are conserved among different fungi and have potential functional and evolutionary importance. Here, we review the recent findings about the occurrence, regulation, function, and evolution of A-to-I mRNA editing in fungi.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAnimalsCodon, TerminatorEpigenesis, GeneticEvolution, MolecularFungal ProteinsFungiNucleic Acid ConformationProtein KinasesCodon, TerminatorFungal ProteinsProtein KinasesAdaptationADARADATAdenosineDeaminationEpigeneticFusarium graminearumInosineNeurospora crassaNon-synonymous editingRNA modificationSexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID30302531
PMCPMC11105437
OpenAlexW2897019575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.