Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302515›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2019

[Erratum to: Effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy : Influence of clinical response from the patient's point of view].

M Belz, M Besse, L Krech, I Methfessel, D Zilles

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M BelzKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Station 4193, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, v. Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. mbelz1@gwdg.de.
M BesseKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Station 4193, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, v. Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
L KrechKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Station 4193, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, v. Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
I MethfesselKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Station 4193, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, v. Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
D ZillesKlinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Station 4193, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, v. Siebold-Str. 3, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a highly effective, yet still controversial therapy for both the general public and psychiatrists. In this study, we investigated the patients' view regarding effectiveness and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy under consideration of individual clinical response. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn 31 patients with major depression, subjective effectiveness and tolerability were assessed via a differentiated questionnaire prior to, during, and after ECT. Symptoms were rated using the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS) and the Beck depression inventory II (BDI‑II)

resultsPatients assessed ECT to be generally effective both before and after the treatment. This view was independent of their individual treatment success. In contrast, patients' rating of individual effectiveness depended on the objective improvement of their symptoms. Side effects were rated to be generally slight to moderate.

conclusionAgainst the background of persisting criticism towards ECT, the viewpoint of involved patients provides us with important references for an appropriate judgement of this therapy. The results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio for ECT from the patients' perspective.

Identifiers

PMID30302515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.