ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2018
Experimental pericardial tamponade-translation of a clinical problem to its large animal model.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPericardial tamponade is a life-threatening medical emergency, when the hemodynamic consequences of low cardiac output severely disturb the perfusion of the peripheral tissues. Our aim was to design a reliable large animal model to reproduce the clinical scenario with the relevant pathophysiological consequences of pericardial tamponade -induced cardiogenic shock. MATERIAL AND
methodsAnesthetized Vietnamese mini pigs were used (n=12). Following laparotomy, a cannula was fixed into the pericardium through the diaphragm without thoracotomy. A sham-operated group (n=6) served as control, while in the second group (n=6) pericardial tamponade was induced by intra-pericardial injection of heparinized own blood. Throughout the 60-min pericardial tamponade and the 180-min reperfusion, macro hemodynamics, renal circulation and the mesenteric macro- and micro-circulatory parameters were monitored. Myeloperoxidase activity was measured to detect neutrophil leukocyte accumulation and in vivo histology was performed by confocal laser scanning endomicroscopy to observe the structural changes of the intestinal mucosa.
resultsPT increased the central venous pressure, heart rate, and decreased mean arterial pressure. The mesenteric artery flow (from 355.5±112.4 vs 182.0±59.1 mL/min) and renal arterial flow (from 159.63±50.7 vs 35.902±27.9 mL//min) and the micro-circulation of the ileum was reduced. The myeloperoxidase activity was elevated (from 3.66±1.6 to 7.01±1.44 mU/mg protein) and manifest injury of the ileal mucosa was present.
conclusionThis experimental model suitably mimics the hemodynamics and the pathology of clinical pericardial tamponade situations, and on this basis, it provides an opportunity to study the adverse macro- and micro-circulatory effects and biochemical consequences of human cardiogenic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.