Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302255›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2018

Comparative proteomic analysis provides insight into a complex regulatory network of taproot formation in radish (

Yang Xie, Liang Xu, Yan Wang, Lianxue Fan, Yinglong Chen, Mingjia Tang, Xiaobo Luo, Liwang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Horticulture research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Roles of Abscisic Acid and Gibberellins in Stem/Root Tuber Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of a major and stable QTL on chromosome 5A confers spike length in wheat (Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang Xie1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Liang Xu1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Yan Wang1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Lianxue Fan1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Yinglong Chen2The UWA Institute of Agriculture, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001 Australia.
Mingjia Tang1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Xiaobo Luo1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Liwang Liu1National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Biology and Genetic Improvement (East China) of MOA, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095 PR China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fleshy taproot of radish is an important storage organ determining its yield and quality. Taproot thickening is a complex developmental process in radish. However, the molecular mechanisms governing this process remain unclear at the proteome level. In this study, a comparative proteomic analysis was performed to analyze the proteome changes at three developmental stages of taproot thickening using iTRAQ approach. In total, 1862 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were identified from 6342 high-confidence proteins, among which 256 up-regulated proteins displayed overlapped accumulation in S1 (pre-cortex splitting stage) vs. S2 (cortex splitting stage) and S1 vs. S3 (expanding stage) pairs, whereas 122 up-regulated proteins displayed overlapped accumulation in S1 vs. S3 and S2 vs. S3 pairs. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis showed that these DEPs were mainly involved in several processes such as "starch and sucrose metabolism", "plant hormone signal transduction", and "biosynthesis of secondary metabolites". A high concordance existed between iTRAQ and RT-qPCR at the mRNA expression levels. Furthermore, association analysis showed that 187, 181, and 96 DEPs were matched with their corresponding differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in S1 vs. S2, S1 vs. S3, and S2 vs. S3 comparison, respectively. Notably, several functional proteins including cell division cycle 5-like protein (CDC5), expansin B1 (EXPB1), and xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase protein 24 (XTH24) were responsible for cell division and expansion during radish taproot thickening process. These results could facilitate a better understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying taproot thickening, and provide valuable information for the identification of critical genes/proteins responsible for taproot thickening in root vegetable crops.

Identifiers

PMID30302255
PMCPMC6165848
OpenAlexW2884224908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.