ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2018
An investigation on endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery and related outcomes.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for pneumonia after endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery in cases with prior esophageal cancer treatment.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- A nomogram for predicting occult lymph node metastasis in early hypopharyngeal cancer with cN0.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- The investigation of salvage endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery after chemoradiotherapy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020Article
- The Emerging Role of Robotic Surgery among Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches in the Treatment of Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRobotic surgery is used in Europe and the US for oropharyngeal/hypopharyngeal cancers. Although robots can successfully perform procedures that are too delicate for surgeons and quickly learn accurate techniques, robotic surgery is not still authorized for the craniocervical region in Japan. In Japan, endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS) is widely performed. Because oropharyngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer can be resected at an early stage, we have contributed to an improvement in the survival rate.
aimTo analyze clinical outcomes and risk factors of postoperative cervical lymph node metastases after ELPS. MATERIAL AND
methodsFifty-two patients with 71 superficial oropharyngeal/hypopharyngeal cancers were included. A Sato-type arcuation laryngoscope was inserted, and oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal fields were secured. We have recently been performing head and neck surgery using only a flexible endoscope because gastroscopy and arcuation-type forceps interfere with each other.
resultsThe 5-year survival rate was 95.2%. The risk factors of lymph node metastases were examined. The depth of the tumor significantly affected lymph node metastases.
conclusionsWith a favorable 5-year survival rate and low functional impairment, ELPS is an extremely effective form of treatment. It can provide a clear field of view in the hypopharynx and has a low cost; hence, it should be further developed as a treatment method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.