Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302147›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2018

Randomized trial of umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients: extraction of gallbladder through subxiphoid port vs. umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Min Li, Baoqiang Cao, Renhua Gong, Dengqun Sun, Peisong Zhang, Xudong Jiang, Yanfei Sheng

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07672145 (Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07672145 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Gallbladder Extraction Via the Subxiphoid Port and the Infraumbilical Port During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing Edward Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsCholelithiasis (Without Cholecystitis), Cholecystitis, AcuteArmsSubxiphoid Gallbladder Retrieval, Infraumbilical Gallbladder Extraction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min LiDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei, China.
Baoqiang CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Renhua GongDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Dengqun SunDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Peisong ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Xudong JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Yanfei ShengDepartment of Emergency Department, Anhui Armed Police General Hospital, Hefei, China.
Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangSu Armed Police General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTrocar site incisional hernia (TSIH) is one of the most common complications of laparoscopic surgery. Using the umbilical port as a common hole for removing the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more likely to lead to TSIH than other ports. Thus, extracting the gallbladder through other ports may reduce the incidence of TSIH.

aimTo ascertain whether extraction of the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port is more beneficial for reducing umbilical incisional hernia than the umbilical port. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom April 2014 to March 2017, a randomized clinical trial was conducted among patients with high risk of incisional hernia and accepted for three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (TLC) in our department. 182 patients with indications of cholecystectomy were allocated randomly to group A (subxiphoid port) and group B (umbilical port). Data collection was carried out on operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, wound infection and TSIH in the early postoperative course, and at 1, 10, and 24 months after surgery.

resultsThe incidence of TSIH in group A was lower than that in group B (4.9% vs. 14.6%; odds ratio = 8.02; 95% CI: 2.15-47.6; p < 0.001). The mean operative time of group A was significantly shorter than that of group B (35 ±15.16 min vs. 42 ±14.58 min, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in wound infection rate between group A and group B (p = 0.068). The data of hospital stay (p = 0.428) and postoperative pain (p = 0.349) of all analyzed patients were similar in the two groups.

conclusionsExtraction of the gallbladder through the subxiphoid port can reduce umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients effectively.

Indexed as

laparoscopic cholecystectomysubxiphoid porttrocar site incisional herniaumbilical port

Identifiers

PMID30302147
PMCPMC6174159
OpenAlexW2803697978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.