ArticleScientific reports2018
Templated replication (or lack thereof) under prebiotically pertinent conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Template-Directed Replication and Chiral Resolution during Wet-Dry Cycling in Hydrothermal Pools.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Nonenzymatic Template-Directed Primer Extension Using 2'-3' Cyclic Nucleotides Under Wet-Dry Cycles.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2023Article
- Distinguishing Biotic vs. Abiotic Origins of 'Bio'signatures: Clues from Messy Prebiotic Chemistry for Detection of Life in the Universe.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Influence of Metal Ions on Model Protoamphiphilic Vesicular Systems: Insights from Laboratory and Analogue Studies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Spontaneous emergence of membrane-forming protoamphiphiles from a lipid-amino acid mixture under wet-dry cycles.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Lipid-Assisted Polymerization of Nucleotides.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate replication of encoded information would have been crucial for the formation and propagation of functional ribozymes during the early evolution of life. Studies aimed at understanding prebiotically pertinent nonenzymatic reactions have predominantly used activated nucleotides. However, the existence of concentrated pools of activated monomers on prebiotic Earth is debatable. In this study, we explored the feasibility of nonenzymatic copying reactions using the more prebiotically relevant 5'-nucleoside monophosphates (5'-NMP). These reactions, involving a 20-mer primer, were performed in the presence of amphiphiles, under volcanic geothermal conditions. Interestingly, the extended primer was not comparable to the expected full length 21-mer product. Our results suggest loss of the nitrogenous base in the extended primer. This phenomenon persisted even after lowering the temperature and when different rehydration solutions were used. We envisage that the loss of the informational moiety on the incoming 5'-NMP, might be occurring during addition of this monomer to the pre-existing oligomer. Significantly, when 5'-ribose monophosphate was used, multiple additions to the aforementioned primer were observed that resulted in hybrid polymers. Such hybrid oligomers could have been important for exploring a vast chemical space of plausible alternate nucleobases, thus having important implications for the origin of primitive informational polymers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.