Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30302008›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Templated replication (or lack thereof) under prebiotically pertinent conditions.

Niraja V Bapat, Sudha Rajamani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nonenzymatic Template-Directed Primer Extension Using 2'-3' Cyclic Nucleotides Under Wet-Dry Cycles.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lipid-Assisted Polymerization of Nucleotides.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niraja V BapatIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, 411 008, Maharashtra, India.
Sudha RajamaniIndian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pashan, Pune, 411 008, Maharashtra, India. srajamani@iiserpune.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate replication of encoded information would have been crucial for the formation and propagation of functional ribozymes during the early evolution of life. Studies aimed at understanding prebiotically pertinent nonenzymatic reactions have predominantly used activated nucleotides. However, the existence of concentrated pools of activated monomers on prebiotic Earth is debatable. In this study, we explored the feasibility of nonenzymatic copying reactions using the more prebiotically relevant 5'-nucleoside monophosphates (5'-NMP). These reactions, involving a 20-mer primer, were performed in the presence of amphiphiles, under volcanic geothermal conditions. Interestingly, the extended primer was not comparable to the expected full length 21-mer product. Our results suggest loss of the nitrogenous base in the extended primer. This phenomenon persisted even after lowering the temperature and when different rehydration solutions were used. We envisage that the loss of the informational moiety on the incoming 5'-NMP, might be occurring during addition of this monomer to the pre-existing oligomer. Significantly, when 5'-ribose monophosphate was used, multiple additions to the aforementioned primer were observed that resulted in hybrid polymers. Such hybrid oligomers could have been important for exploring a vast chemical space of plausible alternate nucleobases, thus having important implications for the origin of primitive informational polymers.

Identifiers

PMID30302008
PMCPMC6177409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.