Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30301792›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Protein shape modulates crowding effects.

Alex J Guseman, Gerardo M Perez Goncalves, Shannon L Speer, Gregory B Young, Gary J Pielak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Protein oxidation in crowded environments.The Biochemical journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crowding-induced stabilization and destabilization in a single protein.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Crowding beyond excluded volume: A tale of two dimers.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex J GusemanDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Gerardo M Perez GoncalvesDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Shannon L SpeerDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Gregory B YoungDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Gary J PielakDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599; gary_pielak@unc.edu.

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008570 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KUHLMAN, BRIAN A, SLEP, KEVIN C · 1995 to 2022
$5.1M
Influence of Quinary Interactions on Protein-Protein InteractionsF31GM126763 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GUSEMAN, ALEX JOSEPH · 2017 to 2017
$33k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NIGMS NIH HHS F31 GM126763NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are usually studied in dilute buffered solutions with macromolecule concentrations of <10 g/L. In cells, however, the macromolecule concentration can exceed 300 g/L, resulting in nonspecific interactions between macromolecules. These interactions can be divided into hard-core steric repulsions and "soft" chemical interactions. Here, we test a hypothesis from scaled particle theory; the influence of hard-core repulsions on a protein dimer depends on its shape. We tested the idea using a side-by-side dumbbell-shaped dimer and a domain-swapped ellipsoidal dimer. Both dimers are variants of the B1 domain of protein G and differ by only three residues. The results from the relatively inert synthetic polymer crowding molecules, Ficoll and PEG, support the hypothesis, indicating that the domain-swapped dimer is stabilized by hard-core repulsions while the side-by-side dimer shows little to no stabilization. We also show that protein cosolutes, which interact primarily through nonspecific chemical interactions, have the same small effect on both dimers. Our results suggest that the shape of the protein dimer determines the influence of hard-core repulsions, providing cells with a mechanism for regulating protein-protein interactions.

Indexed as

FicollMacromolecular SubstancesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProtein Interaction MapsProtein MultimerizationProteinsFicollMacromolecular SubstancesPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersProteinsmacromolecular crowdingprotein−protein interactionsscaled particle theory

Identifiers

PMID30301792
PMCPMC6205421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.