Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30301756›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Insensitivity to Pain upon Adult-Onset Deletion of Nav1.7 or Its Blockade with Selective Inhibitors.

Shannon D Shields, Lunbin Deng, Rebecca M Reese, Michelle Dourado, Janet Tao, Oded Foreman, Jae H Chang, David H Hackos

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NaThe Journal of comparative neurology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Identification and targeting of a unique NaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  19. NaExperimental neurology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shannon D ShieldsDepartments of Neuroscience, shields.shannon@gene.com hackos.david@gene.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8006-7103
Lunbin DengDepartments of Neuroscience.
Rebecca M ReeseDepartments of Neuroscience.
Michelle DouradoDepartments of Neuroscience.
Janet TaoPathology, and.
Oded ForemanPathology, and.
Jae H ChangDrug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080.ORCID 0000-0003-3457-7695
David H HackosDepartments of Neuroscience, shields.shannon@gene.com hackos.david@gene.com.
Gene Therapy Laboratory · FRSunesis (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strong human genetic evidence points to an essential contribution of the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.7 to pain sensation: loss of Nav1.7 function leads to congenital insensitivity to pain, whereas gain-of-function mutations in the

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedFemaleGanglia, SpinalHEK293 CellsHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPainPain Insensitivity, CongenitalPain PerceptionSodium Channel BlockersNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelScn9a protein, mouseSodium Channel Blockersacylsulfonamidecongenital insensitivity to paindrug developmentNav1.7paintamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID30301756
PMCPMC6596201
OpenAlexW2896902447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.