ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2018
Optimal contrast-enhanced MRI image thresholding for accurate prediction of ventricular tachycardia using ex-vivo high resolution models.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arrhythmogenic vulnerability of re-entrant pathways in post-infarct ventricular tachycardia assessed by advanced computational modelling.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Fully Automatic Scar Segmentation for Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Images in Left Ventricle with Myocardial Infarction.Current medical science · 2021Article
- Contrast enhancement of medical images using a new version of the World Cup Optimization algorithm.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patient specific models created from contrast-enhanced (i.e. late-gadolinium, LGE) MRI images can be used for prediction of reentry location and clinical ablation planning. However, there is still a need for direct and systematic comparison between characteristics of ventricular tachycardia (VT) morphologies predicted in computational models and those acquired in clinical or experimental protocols. In this study, we aimed to: 1) assess the differences in VT morphologies predicted by modeling and recorded in experiments in terms of patterns and location of reentries, earliest and latest activation sites, and cycle lengths; and 2) define the optimal range of infarct tissue threshold values which provide best match between simulation and experimental results. To achieve these goals, we utilized LGE-MRI images from 4 swine hearts with inducible monomorphic VT. The images were segmented to identify non-infarcted myocardium, semi viable gray zone (GZ), and core scar based on pixel intensity. Several models were reconstructed from each LGE-MRI scan, with voxels of intensity between that of non-infarcted myocardium and 20-50% of the maximum intensity (in 10% increments) in the infarct region classified as GZ. VT induction was simulated in each model. Our simulation results showed that using GZ intensity thresholds of 20% or 30% resulted in the best match of simulated propagation patterns and reentry locations with those from the experiment. Overall, we matched 70% (7/10) morphologies for all the hearts. Our simulation shows that MRI-based computational models of hearts with myocardial infarction can accurately reproduce the majority of experimentally recorded post-infarction VTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.