Observational studyBMC pediatrics2018
Adherence to the neonatal resuscitation algorithm for preterm infants in a tertiary hospital in Spain.
Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and implementation of educational modules on management of neonates with critical congenital heart disease in the delivery room (LEARN-CHD).Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Trial
- Assessment of adherence to the neonatal resuscitation program using video recording: a prospective observational study.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Predicting the Need for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Preterm Infants in the Delivery Room Using Machine Learning Models: Analysis of a Korean Neonatal Network Database.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Impact of the Neonatal Resuscitation Video Review program for neonatal staff: a qualitative analysis.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Potential benefits and challenges of simulation-based neonatal resuscitation competition: A survey analysis of provincial competition in China.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Management of Paediatric Cardiac Arrest due to Shockable Rhythm-A Simulation-Based Study at Children's Hospitals in a German Federal State.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) guidelines and timing of major resuscitation events in delivery rooms at a level III NICU: Understanding deviations.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Neonatal mortality and video assessment of resuscitation in four district hospitals in Pemba, Tanzania.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Observational
- Simulation in neonatal care: towards a change in traditional training?European journal of pediatrics · 2022Review
- Assessment of temporal variations in adherence to NRP using video recording in the delivery room.Resuscitation plus · 2021Article
- Improving Guideline Compliance and Documentation Through Auditing Neonatal Resuscitation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is evidence that delivery room resuscitation of very preterm infants often deviates from internationally recommended guidelines. There were no published data in Spain regarding the quality of neonatal resuscitation. Therefore, we decided to evaluate resuscitation team adherence to neonatal resuscitation guidelines after birth in very preterm infants.
methodsWe conducted an observational study. We video recorded resuscitations of preterm infants < 32 weeks' gestational age and evaluated every step during resuscitation according to a score-sheet specifically designed for this purpose, following Carbine's method, where higher scores indicated that more intense resuscitation maneuvers were required. We divided the score achieved by the total possible points per patient to obtain the percentage of adherence to the algorithm. We also compared resuscitations performed by staff neonatologists to those performed by pediatricians on-call. We compared percentages of adherence to the algorithm with the Chi-square test for large groups and Fisher's exact test for smaller groups. We compared assigned Apgar scores with those given after analyzing the recordings and described them by their median and interquartile range. We measured the interrater agreement between Apgar scores with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Linear and logarithmic regressions were drawn to characterize the pattern of algorithm adherence. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V.20. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Our Hospital Ethics Committee approved this project, and we obtained parental written consent beforehand.
resultsSixteen percent of our resuscitations followed the algorithm. The number of mistakes per resuscitation was low. Global adherence to the algorithm was 80.9%. Ventilation and surfactant administration were performed best, whereas preparation and initial steps were done with worse adherence to the algorithm. Intubation required, on average, 2.2 attempts; success on the first attempt happened in 33.3% of cases. Only 12.5% of intubations were achieved within the allotted 30 s. Many errors were attributable to timing. Resuscitations led by pediatricians on-call were performed as correctly as those by staff neonatologists.
conclusionsResuscitation often deviates from the internationally recognized algorithm. Perfectly performed resuscitations are infrequent, although global adherence to the algorithm is high. Neonatologists and pediatricians need intubation training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.