Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30301212›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Protected Natural Areas: In Sickness and in Health.

Teresa Romanillos, Roser Maneja, Diego Varga, Llorenç Badiella, Martí Boada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effectiveness of China's Protected Areas in Mitigating Human Activity Pressure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Concentration of Healthcare Resources in China: The Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Its Spatial Drivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teresa RomanillosInstitute of Environmental Sciencies and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. tromanillos@gmail.com.
Roser ManejaInstitute of Environmental Sciencies and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. roser.maneja@uab.cat.
Diego VargaGeography Department, University of Girona, 17071 Girona, Spain. diego.varga@udg.edu.
Llorenç BadiellaServei d'Estadística Aplicada, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. marti.boada@uab.cat.
Martí BoadaInstitute of Environmental Sciencies and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Cerdanyola del Vallés, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. diego.varga@udg.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies show the benefits that contact with the natural environment have for human health, but there are few studies on the role of Protected Natural Areas (PNAs), either from the preventive point of view or on their potential benefits, on individuals with health problems. A study was made of the relationship between the visitation of Montseny Natural Park and Biosphere Reserve and health, from the perspective of a population group with different diseases. A total of 250 patients resident in the areas near the park were surveyed, recording their beliefs about the benefits of nature, as well as the reasons for visiting and the activities associated with health that they carried out in the park. The pure air is the most valued benefit (27.2%), particularly for those with allergies. The majority (57%) visit the park for health reasons. High levels (82%) of exercise are recorded, especially by patients with heart diseases (85%), and 65% exercised in the park. More physical activity is mentioned among those that visit the park most often, particularly among those that carried it out for health reasons. Plants were collected for medicinal use by 39.6%. The study confirmed the significant role of the Montseny Natural Park and Biosphere Reserve as a health resource for individuals with diseases that live near it. It also corroborates the beneficial effects that the PNA provide in human health.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesHealthNatureParks, RecreationalRehabilitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnvironmentExerciseFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMediterranean RegionMiddle Ageddiseasehealthhealth-related activitiesprotected natural areas

Identifiers

PMID30301212
PMCPMC6211000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.