Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30300751›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networks.

Charley Gros, Benjamin De Leener, Atef Badji, Josefina Maranzano, Dominique Eden, Sara M Dupont, Jason Talbott, Ren Zhuoquiong, Yaou Liu, Tobias Granberg and 42 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Spinal cord imaging in multiple sclerosis: A vital component we can no longer overlook.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early and Progressive Spinal Cord Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Charting Cervical Spinal Cord Morphometry Across the Lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improved deep joint model with tuned improved LeNet for spinal cord segmentation and injury detection using CT images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Deep Learning Framework for Automated MRI Planimetry in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

52 authors.

Charley GrosNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Benjamin De LeenerNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Atef BadjiNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Josefina MaranzanoMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Dominique EdenNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sara M DupontNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jason TalbottDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ren ZhuoquiongDepartment of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, PR China.
Yaou LiuDepartment of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100053, PR China; Department of Radiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, PR China.
Tobias GranbergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Russell OuelletteDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Yasuhiko TachibanaNational Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Masaaki HoriJuntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kouhei KamiyaJuntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Lydia ChougarJuntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Hospital Cochin, Paris, France.
Leszek StawiarzDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan HillertDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elise BannierCHU Rennes, Radiology Department, France; Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, 6074, Visages U1128, France.
Anne KerbratUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, 6074, Visages U1128, France; CHU Rennes, Neurology Department, France.
Gilles EdanUniv Rennes, Inria, CNRS, Inserm, IRISA UMR, 6074, Visages U1128, France; CHU Rennes, Neurology Department, France.
Pierre LabaugeMS Unit, DPT of Neurology, University Hospital of Montpellier, France.
Virginie CallotAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France; APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France.
Jean PelletierAPHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France; APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Bertrand AudoinAPHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France; APHM, Department of Neurology, CHU Timone, APHM, Marseille, France.
Henitsoa RasoanandrianinaAix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France; APHM, CHU Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France.
Jean-Christophe BrissetObservatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP), Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Hospices Civils de Lyon, CREATIS-LRMN, UMR 5220 CNRS & U 1044 INSERM, Lyon, France.
Paola ValsasinaNeuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Maria A RoccaNeuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FilippiNeuroimaging Research Unit, INSPE, Division of Neuroscience, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Rohit BakshiBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Shahamat TauhidBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Ferran PradosQueen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Center for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marios YiannakasQueen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Hugh KearneyQueen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Olga CiccarelliQueen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Seth SmithVanderbilt University, Tennessee, USA.
Constantina Andrada TreabaMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Caterina MaineroMartinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Jennifer LefeuvreNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Daniel S ReichNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Govind NairNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Vincent AuclairBiospective Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Donald G McLarenBiospective Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada.
Allan R MartinDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shahabeddin VahdatNeurology Department, Stanford University, USA; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Ali KhatibiMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Julien DoyonMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Timothy ShepherdNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Erik CharlsonNYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA.
Sridar NarayananMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Julien Cohen-AdadNeuroPoly Lab, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Functional Neuroimaging Unit, CRIUGM, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: https://skype.com/jcohenadad.

Funding

Multimodal MRI in Multiple SclerosisZIANS003119 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI REICH, DANIEL · 2010 to 2025
$53.4M
Structural and Functional MRI of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Multiple SclerosisR01NS109114 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Microstructural Characterization of the Optic Nerve in Optic NeuritisR01EY023240 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
In Vivo Macromolecular and Protein-Based MRI in the Spinal Cord of MS PatientsR21NS087465 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2014 to 2015
$431k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA NS003119NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023240NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109114NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS087465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spinal cord is frequently affected by atrophy and/or lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Segmentation of the spinal cord and lesions from MRI data provides measures of damage, which are key criteria for the diagnosis, prognosis, and longitudinal monitoring in MS. Automating this operation eliminates inter-rater variability and increases the efficiency of large-throughput analysis pipelines. Robust and reliable segmentation across multi-site spinal cord data is challenging because of the large variability related to acquisition parameters and image artifacts. In particular, a precise delineation of lesions is hindered by a broad heterogeneity of lesion contrast, size, location, and shape. The goal of this study was to develop a fully-automatic framework - robust to variability in both image parameters and clinical condition - for segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary MS lesions from conventional MRI data of MS and non-MS cases. Scans of 1042 subjects (459 healthy controls, 471 MS patients, and 112 with other spinal pathologies) were included in this multi-site study (n = 30). Data spanned three contrasts (T

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultiple SclerosisObserver VariationPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal CordConvolutional neural networksMRIMultiple sclerosisSegmentationSpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID30300751
PMCPMC6759925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.