Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30300636›Full record

ReviewBrain research2019

A competitive model for striatal action selection.

S Bariselli, W C Fobbs, M C Creed, A V Kravitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Altered Postnatal Chromatin Development in the Nucleus Accumbens Primes Enduring Stress Sensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors controlbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Similar Response Dynamics Represent Opposite Behaviors and Rewards in the Frontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Drd1-cre mouse line with nucleus accumbens gene dysregulation exhibits blunted fentanyl seeking.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Changes in nucleus accumbens core translatome accompanying incubation of cocaine craving.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BariselliNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
W C FobbsNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
M C CreedWashington University in St Louis, Department of Anesthesiology, St Louis, MO, United States.
A V KravitzNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States; National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: lex.kravitz@nih.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DK999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The direct and indirect pathway striatal medium spiny neurons (dMSNs and iMSNs) have long been linked to action selection, but the precise roles of these neurons in this process remain unclear. Here, we review different models of striatal pathway function, focusing on the classic "go/no-go" model which posits that dMSNs facilitate movement while iMSNs inhibit movement, and the "complementary" model, which argues that dMSNs facilitate the selection of specific actions while iMSNs inhibit potentially conflicting actions. We discuss the merits and shortcomings of these models and propose a "competitive" model to explain the contribution of these two pathways to behavior. The "competitive" model argues that rather than inhibiting conflicting actions, iMSNs are tuned to the same actions that dMSNs facilitate, and the two populations "compete" to determine the animal's behavioral response. This model provides a theoretical explanation for how these pathways work together to select actions. In addition, it provides a link between action selection and behavioral reinforcement, via modulating synaptic strength at inputs onto dMSNs and iMSNs. Finally, this model makes predictions about how imbalances in the activity of these pathways may underlie behavioral traits associated with psychiatric disorders. Understanding the roles of these striatal pathways in action selection may help to clarify the neuronal mechanisms of decision-making under normal and pathological conditions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBasal GangliaCocaineCorpus StriatumDopamineGABAergic NeuronsHumansModels, AnimalMovementNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsReceptors, Dopamine D2Reinforcement, PsychologyCocaineDopamineReceptors, Dopamine D2ApproachAvoidanceDopamineDrug-seekingRepetitive behaviorStriatum

Identifiers

PMID30300636
PMCPMC6451675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.