Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30300381›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

An integrative approach using real-world data to identify alternative therapeutic uses of existing drugs.

Kouichi Hosomi, Mai Fujimoto, Kazutaka Ushio, Lili Mao, Juran Kato, Mitsutaka Takada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Real-world incidence of nausea and vomiting induced by antineoplastic agents: insights and future directions from the Japanese adverse drug event report database.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kouichi HosomiDivision of Clinical Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-2766
Mai FujimotoDivision of Clinical Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kazutaka UshioInnovation and Entrepreneurship, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Muraoka-Higashi, 2- Chome, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1263-1948
Lili MaoInnovation and Entrepreneurship, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Muraoka-Higashi, 2- Chome, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan.
Juran KatoInnovation and Entrepreneurship, Research, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Muraoka-Higashi, 2- Chome, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan.
Mitsutaka TakadaDivision of Clinical Drug Informatics, School of Pharmacy, Kindai University, Kowakae, Higashi-osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kindai University · JPTakeda (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different computational approaches are employed to efficiently identify novel repositioning possibilities utilizing different sources of information and algorithms. It is critical to propose high-valued candidate-repositioning possibilities before conducting lengthy in vivo validation studies that consume significant resources. Here we report a novel multi-methodological approach to identify opportunities for drug repositioning. We performed analyses of real-world data (RWD) acquired from the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the claims database maintained by the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC). These analyses were followed by cross-validation through bioinformatics analyses of gene expression data. Inverse associations revealed using disproportionality analysis (DPA) and sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) were used to detect potential drug-repositioning signals. To evaluate the validity of the approach, we conducted a feasibility study to identify marketed drugs with the potential for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Primary analyses of the FAERS and JMDC claims databases identified psycholeptics such as haloperidol, diazepam, and hydroxyzine as candidates that may improve the treatment of IBD. To further investigate the mechanistic relevance between hit compounds and disease pathology, we conducted bioinformatics analyses of the associations of the gene expression profiles of these compounds with disease. We identified common biological features among genes differentially expressed with or without compound treatment as well as disease-perturbation data available from open sources, which strengthened the mechanistic rationale of our initial findings. We further identified pathways such as cytokine signaling that are influenced by these drugs. These pathways are relevant to pathologies and can serve as alternative targets of therapy. Integrative analysis of RWD such as those available from adverse-event databases, claims databases, and transcriptome analyses represent an effective approach that adds value to efficiently identifying potential novel therapeutic opportunities.

Indexed as

AdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAlgorithmsChild, PreschoolComputational BiologyCytokinesDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug RepositioningGene ExpressionHumansJapanMiddle AgedPharmaceutical PreparationsSignal TransductionUnited StatesCytokinesPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID30300381
PMCPMC6177143
OpenAlexW2896541189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.