Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30300356›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Human posterior parietal and dorsal premotor cortex encode the visual properties of an upcoming action.

Artur Pilacinski, Melanie Wallscheid, Axel Lindner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Grasping with a Twist: Dissociating Action Goals from Motor Actions in Human Frontoparietal Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Movement Imitation via an Abstract Trajectory Representation in Dorsal Premotor Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Artur PilacinskiHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-4372
Melanie WallscheidHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Tuebingen, Germany.
Axel LindnerHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Department of Cognitive Neurology, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral studies show that motor actions are planned by adapting motor programs to produce desired visual consequences. Does this mean that the brain plans these visual consequences independent of the motor actions required to obtain them? Here we addressed this question by investigating planning-related fMRI activity in human posterior parietal (PPC) and dorsal premotor (PMd) cortex. By manipulating visual movement of a virtual end-effector controlled via button presses we could dissociate motor actions from their sensory outcome. A clear representation of the visual consequences was visible in both PPC and PMd activity during early planning stages. Our findings suggest that in both PPC and PMd action plans are initially represented on the basis of the desired sensory outcomes while later activity shifts towards representing motor programs.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotor CortexMovementParietal LobePhotic StimulationReaction TimeVision, OcularVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID30300356
PMCPMC6177124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.