Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30300341›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The neuroanatomy of speech sequencing at the syllable level.

Feng Rong, A Lisette Isenberg, Erica Sun, Gregory Hickok

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Premotor cortex uses a compositional neural geometry to plan words.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Cortical Organization of Syntax.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020
    Article
  15. Structured sequence processing and combinatorial binding: neurobiologically and computationally informed hypotheses.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng RongDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
A Lisette IsenbergDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Erica SunDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8025-2376
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Integrative Functions of the Planum TemporaleR01DC009659 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HICKOK, GREGORY, SABERI, KOUROSH · 2009 to 2020
$5.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009659
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correctly ordering a sequence of speech sounds is a crucial aspect of speech production. Although studies have yielded a rich body of data on the neural substrates of visuomotor sequencing and sequence learning, research on brain regions and their functions involving speech sequence production hasn't attracted much attention until recently. Previous functional MRI studies manipulating the complexity of sequences at the phonemic, syllabic, and suprasyllabic levels have revealed a network of motor-related cortical and sub-cortical speech regions. In this study, we directly compared human brain activity measured with functional MRI during processing of a sequence of syllables compared with the same syllables processed individually. Among a network of regions independently identified as being part of the sensorimotor circuits for speech production, only the left posterior inferior frontal gyrus (pars opercularis, lIFG), the supplementary motor area (SMA), and the left inferior parietal lobe (lIPL) responded more during the production of syllable sequences compared to producing the same syllables articulated one at a time.

Indexed as

Brain MappingPhoneticsSpeechSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeuroanatomyParietal LobeSensorimotor CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30300341
PMCPMC6177116
OpenAlexW2897332282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.