Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018
Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Laser Vaporization in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence Rate and Histopathologic Evaluation After DWLS Diode Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometriomas: Results From a Prospective, Multicentre, Clinical Trial.
Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas: A Case-Based Histopathological Study
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometrioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of Ablation Versus Cystectomy for Endometrioma on Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence, and Pregnancy: An Updated Meta-Analysis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Pooled it
- Diminished Ovarian Reserve in Endometriosis: Insights from In Vitro, In Vivo, and Human Studies-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for endometriosis in Japan (The 3rd edition).The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Guideline
- The Effect of Laparoscopic Endometrioma Surgery on Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of endometrioma surgery on ovarian reserve: a prospective, randomized, pilot study comparing stripping with COThe Journal of international medical research · 2020Trial
- Article
- Endometriosis and Reproductive Sparing Surgery: A Narrative Review and AGREE II-S-Based Evaluation of International Guidelines.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Does endometrioma diameter impact serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Comparative effect of different surgical treatments for ovarian endometrioma on anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Ovarian damage following surgery for endometriomas, 20 years later: did awareness improve the situation?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Evidence on Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Endometriosis Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Comparison of Surgical Interventions for Endometrioma: A Systematic Review of Their Efficacy in Addressing Infertility.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: Modern Concepts of Their Clinical Outcomes, Treatment, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Role of Laser and Microwave in Treatment of Endocrine Disorders: A Systematic Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2024Review
- What is the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cystectomy with fertility preservation?Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Endometriosis and Adolescence: The Impact of Dysmenorrhea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Surgical Management of Ovarian Endometrioma: Impact on Ovarian Reserve Parameters and Reproductive Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionDoes CO2 laser vaporization offer better results in treating endometrioma in terms of ovarian reserve preservation compared to traditional cystectomy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Assessing both antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels as measures of ovarian reserve, the results suggest that CO2 technology may be an alternative treatment for endometrioma, causing minimal damage to adjacent healthy ovarian tissue. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Excisional surgery has been questioned as an ideal surgical approach for endometriomas because it is associated with potential reduction of ovarian reserve. Recently, vaporization with CO2 laser in-line-of-sight, according to the 'three-step procedure', has been proposed as the best method to preserve ovarian function. However, no randomized controlled trials have been conducted to compare cystectomy and 'one-step' CO2 fiber laser vaporization (without GnRH agonist therapy) with respect to the ovarian reserve. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A multicentre randomized clinical trial including 60 patients was performed between July 2017 and February 2018. Computerized randomization was conducted to allocate them in a proportion of 1:1 either to Group 1 (laparoscopic stripping: cystectomy) or Group 2 (CO2 laser vaporization). Patients in Group 1 underwent a standardized laparoscopic stripping technique; patients in Group 2 underwent drainage of the cyst content, biopsy and vaporization of the internal wall with a CO2 fiber laser. Patients underwent pelvic ultrasound examination to determine the AFC and blood sampling to determine AMH levels before surgery and at 1- and 3-month follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsPatients undergoing surgery for symptomatic endometriomas (infertility and/or pelvic pain) larger than 3 cm were randomized in two groups according to the surgical technique. Patients aged ≥40 years, or with deep infiltrating endometriosis/adenomyosis, or previously submitted to surgical procedures on the ovaries or to hysterectomy were excluded from the study. The primary endpoint was the comparison of intra-group AFC changes before and after surgery (ΔAFC) between the two groups (ΔAFC Group 1 versus ΔAFC Group 2). The secondary endpoint was the modification of serum AMH before and after surgery (ΔAMH) between the two groups (ΔAMH Group 1 versus ΔAMH Group 2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The AFC of the operated ovary was significantly increased in Group 2 (laser vaporization) compared with Group 1 (cystectomy) after surgery (Group 1: from 4.1 ± 2.2 [mean ± SD] at baseline to 6.3 ± 3.5 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: 0.9-4; Group 2: from 3.6 ± 1.9 at baseline to 8.6 ± 4.2 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: 2.8-7.1; P = 0.016); serum AMH levels were significantly reduced at 3 months in Group 1 (from 2.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL at baseline to 1.8 ± 0.8 ng/mL at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.2; P = 0.012) compared with no reduction in Group 2 (from 2.3 ± 1.1 ng/mL at baseline to 1.9 ± 0.9 ng/mL at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: -1 to -0.2; P = 0.09). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The key limitations of the trial were the low accuracy of AFC in estimating the ovarian reserve in ovaries with endometriomas, the limited study size and the relatively short follow-up, which do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe present study suggests that CO2 technology may treat endometrioma with minimal damage to the adjacent healthy ovarian tissue; however, this study should be considered as a preliminary clinical trial, intended to stimulate future larger trials to address this clinically relevant issue. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03227640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 9 July 2017. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 24 July 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.