Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30299482›Full record

Trial reportHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2018

Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial.

M Candiani, J Ottolina, E Posadzka, S Ferrari, L M Castellano, I Tandoi, L Pagliardini, A Nocun, R Jach

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03227640 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Laser Vaporization in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorScientific Institute San RaffaeleRan2016 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsEndometriomaArmsstripping technique, CO2 laser (AcuPulse Duo, Lumenis)
NCT06219044 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence Rate and Histopathologic Evaluation After DWLS Diode Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometriomas: Results From a Prospective, Multicentre, Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2021 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsEndometrioma, Ovarian Endometriosis, Ovarian EndometriomaArmslaparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization
NCT07215130 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas: A Case-Based Histopathological Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKanazawa UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled10ConditionsOvarian Endometrioma, EndometriosisArmsCavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Excisional surgery versus ablative surgery for ovarian endometrioma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical practice guidelines for endometriosis in Japan (The 3rd edition).The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M CandianiGynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
J OttolinaGynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
E PosadzkaEndocrinological Gynecology Department, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland.
S FerrariGynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
L M CastellanoGynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
I TandoiGynaecological Surgery and Endometriosis Departmental Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
L PagliardiniDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
A NocunCentre of Ultrasound Diagnostic MWU DobreUSG, Cracow, Poland.
R JachEndocrinological Gynecology Department, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDoes CO2 laser vaporization offer better results in treating endometrioma in terms of ovarian reserve preservation compared to traditional cystectomy? SUMMARY ANSWER: Assessing both antral follicle count (AFC) and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels as measures of ovarian reserve, the results suggest that CO2 technology may be an alternative treatment for endometrioma, causing minimal damage to adjacent healthy ovarian tissue. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Excisional surgery has been questioned as an ideal surgical approach for endometriomas because it is associated with potential reduction of ovarian reserve. Recently, vaporization with CO2 laser in-line-of-sight, according to the 'three-step procedure', has been proposed as the best method to preserve ovarian function. However, no randomized controlled trials have been conducted to compare cystectomy and 'one-step' CO2 fiber laser vaporization (without GnRH agonist therapy) with respect to the ovarian reserve. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A multicentre randomized clinical trial including 60 patients was performed between July 2017 and February 2018. Computerized randomization was conducted to allocate them in a proportion of 1:1 either to Group 1 (laparoscopic stripping: cystectomy) or Group 2 (CO2 laser vaporization). Patients in Group 1 underwent a standardized laparoscopic stripping technique; patients in Group 2 underwent drainage of the cyst content, biopsy and vaporization of the internal wall with a CO2 fiber laser. Patients underwent pelvic ultrasound examination to determine the AFC and blood sampling to determine AMH levels before surgery and at 1- and 3-month follow-up. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsPatients undergoing surgery for symptomatic endometriomas (infertility and/or pelvic pain) larger than 3 cm were randomized in two groups according to the surgical technique. Patients aged ≥40 years, or with deep infiltrating endometriosis/adenomyosis, or previously submitted to surgical procedures on the ovaries or to hysterectomy were excluded from the study. The primary endpoint was the comparison of intra-group AFC changes before and after surgery (ΔAFC) between the two groups (ΔAFC Group 1 versus ΔAFC Group 2). The secondary endpoint was the modification of serum AMH before and after surgery (ΔAMH) between the two groups (ΔAMH Group 1 versus ΔAMH Group 2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The AFC of the operated ovary was significantly increased in Group 2 (laser vaporization) compared with Group 1 (cystectomy) after surgery (Group 1: from 4.1 ± 2.2 [mean ± SD] at baseline to 6.3 ± 3.5 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: 0.9-4; Group 2: from 3.6 ± 1.9 at baseline to 8.6 ± 4.2 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: 2.8-7.1; P = 0.016); serum AMH levels were significantly reduced at 3 months in Group 1 (from 2.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL at baseline to 1.8 ± 0.8 ng/mL at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.2; P = 0.012) compared with no reduction in Group 2 (from 2.3 ± 1.1 ng/mL at baseline to 1.9 ± 0.9 ng/mL at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI: -1 to -0.2; P = 0.09). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: The key limitations of the trial were the low accuracy of AFC in estimating the ovarian reserve in ovaries with endometriomas, the limited study size and the relatively short follow-up, which do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe present study suggests that CO2 technology may treat endometrioma with minimal damage to the adjacent healthy ovarian tissue; however, this study should be considered as a preliminary clinical trial, intended to stimulate future larger trials to address this clinically relevant issue. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03227640. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 9 July 2017. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 24 July 2017.

Indexed as

AdultEndometriosisFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaser TherapyOvarian DiseasesOvarian ReserveTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30299482
PMCPMC6238368
OpenAlexW2896183697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.