Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30299105›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2018

Assessment of Th1/Th2 Bias of STING Agonists Coated on Microneedles for Possible Use in Skin Allergen Immunotherapy.

Akhilesh Kumar Shakya, Chang Hyun Lee, Md Jasim Uddin, Harvinder Singh Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microneedles in Allergy Immunotherapy: the Present and Future.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. STING Protein-Based In Situ Vaccine Synergizes CD4Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Transdermal delivery for gene therapy.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Gene delivery for immunoengineering.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microneedles coated with peanut allergen enable desensitization of peanut sensitized mice.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akhilesh Kumar ShakyaDepartment of Chemical Engineering , Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas 79409 , United States.
Chang Hyun LeeDepartment of Chemical Engineering , Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas 79409 , United States.
Md Jasim UddinDepartment of Chemical Engineering , Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas 79409 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4116-287X
Harvinder Singh GillDepartment of Chemical Engineering , Texas Tech University , Lubbock , Texas 79409 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-5291
Texas Tech University · US

Funding

Microneedles for allergy immunotherapyR01AI121322 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, HARVINDER SINGH · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI121322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microneedle-based skin allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) can benefit from adjuvants that can stimulate a stronger Th1 response against the allergen. We evaluated two stimulator of interferon genes (STING) agonists, namely, cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) and cyclic diadenylate monophosphate (c-di-AMP), as skin adjuvants using coated microneedles (MNs). For comparison, the approved subcutaneous (SC) hypodermic injection containing alum was used. Ovalbumin (Ova) was used as a model allergen. Ova-specific IgG2a antibody in serum, which is a surrogate marker for Th1 type immune response was significantly higher when STING agonists were used with coated MNs as compared to SC injection of Ova+alum in mice. In contrast, IgG1 antibody, a surrogate marker for Th2 type immune response, was at comparable levels in the MN and SC groups. Restimulation of splenocytes with Ova produced higher levels of Th1 cytokines (IFN-γ and IL-2) in the STING agonists MN groups as compared to the SC group. In conclusion, delivery of STING agonists into the skin using coated MNs activated the Th1 pathway better than SC- and MN-based delivery of alum. Thus, STING agonists could fulfill the role of adjuvants for skin AIT and even for infectious disease vaccines, where stimulation of the Th1 pathway is of interest.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdministration, CutaneousAllergensAlum CompoundsAnimalsCyclic GMPDesensitization, ImmunologicDinucleoside PhosphatesFemaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CModels, AnimalNeedlesOvalbuminSTING ProteinAdjuvants, ImmunologicAllergensAlum Compoundsbis(3',5')-cyclic diguanylic acidcyclic diadenosine phosphateCyclic GMPDinucleoside PhosphatesMembrane ProteinsOvalbuminovalbumin-alumSTING1 protein, humanSTING Proteinallergy adjuvantcutaneous-allergen immunotherapymicroneedlesskin immunotherapySTING adjuvants

Identifiers

PMID30299105
PMCPMC6857785
OpenAlexW2897385458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.