Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298832›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2018

Flow Diverter Therapy Using a Pipeline Embolization Device for 100 Unruptured Large and Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms in a Single Center in a Japanese Population.

Hidenori Oishi, Kosuke Teranishi, Kenji Yatomi, Takashi Fujii, Munetaka Yamamoto, Hajime Arai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hidenori OishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Kosuke TeranishiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Kenji YatomiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Takashi FujiiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Munetaka YamamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Hajime AraiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow diverters (FDs) have been developed for intracranial aneurysms difficult to treat with conventional endovascular therapy and surgical clipping. We reviewed 94 patients with 100 large or giant unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms treated with Pipeline embolization device (PED) embolization from December 2012 to June 2017 at Juntendo University Hospital. The patients' mean age was 63.4 years (range, 19-88), and there were 90 women 89.4%. Aneurysm locations were: C4 (45), C3 (4), and C2 (51) in ICA segments. Mean aneurysm size and neck width were 16.9 ± 6.8 mm and 8.3 ± 4.4 mm, respectively, in 40 symptomatic and 60 asymptomatic aneurysms. Follow-up catheter angiographies of 85 patients with 90 aneurysms showed no filling in 62 aneurysms (68.9%), entry remnant in 16 (17.8%), subtotal filling in 11 (12.2), and total filling in 1 (1.1%) with a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 5.6 months. In-stent stenosis occurred in 1 patient and parent artery occlusion in 2 during follow-up. Hemorrhagic complications occurred in 4 (4.3%): delayed aneurysm rupture (2) and intraparenchymal hemorrhage (2). Ischemic complications with neurological symptoms occurred in 2 (2.1%): very delayed device occlusion (1) and intraprocedural distal embolism (1). Eighteen patients (45%) showed improvement in pre-existing cranial nerve dysfunction because of the aneurysm's mass effect, 3 patients (7.5%) worsened. One patient died of systemic organ failure unassociated with the procedure. Morbidity and mortality rates were 4.3% and 1.1%, respectively. PED embolization for unruptured large and giant ICA aneurysms is safe and efficacious. Physicians should be observant of characteristic risks associated with FD therapy.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery, InternalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAneurysm, RupturedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmJapanMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultflow diverterintracranial aneurysmJapanese populationPipeline embolization device

Identifiers

PMID30298832
PMCPMC6236209
OpenAlexW2895563532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.