Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298671›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2019

Optimal sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.

Martin Happ, Arne C Bathke, Edgar Brunner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Group sequential methods for the Mann-Whitney parameter.Statistical methods in medical research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin HappDepartment of Mathematics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0009-2665
Arne C BathkeDepartment of Mathematics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6260-3726
Edgar BrunnerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
University of Salzburg · ATUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many different proposed procedures for sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test at given type-I and type-II error rates α and β, respectively. Most methods assume very specific models or types of data to simplify calculations (eg, ordered categorical or metric data, location shift alternatives, etc). We present a unified approach that covers metric data with and without ties, count data, ordered categorical data, and even dichotomous data. For that, we calculate the unknown theoretical quantities such as the variances under the null and relevant alternative hypothesis by considering the following "synthetic data" approach. We evaluate data whose empirical distribution functions match the theoretical distribution functions involved in the computations of the unknown theoretical quantities. Then, well-known relations for the ranks of the data are used for the calculations. In addition to computing the necessary sample size N for a fixed allocation proportion t = n

Indexed as

Sample SizeStatistics, NonparametricAlbuminuriaAnimalsAnticonvulsantsEpilepsyFemaleHumansIrritantsKidneyMaleModels, StatisticalNasal MucosaOrgan SizeRatsRats, WistarAnticonvulsantsIrritantsnonparametric relative effectnonparametric statisticsoptimal designrank-based inferencesample size planningWilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test

Identifiers

PMID30298671
PMCPMC6491996
OpenAlexW2805709617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.