Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298562›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2018

Increased risk of recurrence in resected EGFR-positive pN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Masaoki Ito, Yoshihiro Miyata, Kei Kushitani, Tomoharu Yoshiya, Yuichiro Kai, Yasuhiro Tsutani, Takeshi Mimura, Kazuo Konishi, Yukio Takeshima, Morihito Okada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Adjuvant chemotherapy before osimertinib inTranslational lung cancer research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Real-World Survival Outcomes Based onJTO clinical and research reports · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masaoki ItoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7296-4624
Yoshihiro MiyataDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kei KushitaniDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tomoharu YoshiyaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yuichiro KaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yasuhiro TsutaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takeshi MimuraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Kazuo KonishiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Yukio TakeshimaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Morihito OkadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic and recurrent impact of EGFR mutation status in resected pN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma with consideration of the histological subtype.

methodsFollowing retrospective analysis of whole 474 consecutive pathological N0M0 lung adenocarcinoma patients, the prognostic significance of EGFR mutation status was evaluated in limited 394 subjects. Overall survival and recurrence-free interval (RFI) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsThe five-year RFI was 85.7% and 93.3% for EGFR positive (n = 176) and negative (n = 218) cases, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.992, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.005-3.982; P = 0.048). Following the exclusion of specific subtypes free from recurrence or EGFR mutation (adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma), the five-year RFI was obviously poorer in EGFR positive compared to negative cases (80.7% and 92.1%, respectively; HR 2.163, 95% CI 1.055-4.341; P = 0.035). Multivariate analysis excluding the specific subtypes confirmed that male sex, age, current or Ex-smoking status, pleural invasion, and EGFR-positive status were independently associated with shorter RFI. No significant differences in five-year overall survival were found between the EGFR mutation positive and negative groups (88.7% and 93.7%, respectively; HR 1.630, 95% CI 0.787-3.432; P = 0.2).

conclusionEGFR mutations are associated with recurrence in pN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR mutation status and histological subtype should be considered when evaluating the risk of recurrence in resected lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsEGFR mutationhistological subtypelung adenocarcinomarecurrencesurgery

Identifiers

PMID30298562
PMCPMC6275825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.