Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298547›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019

Background field removal for susceptibility mapping of human brain with large susceptibility variations.

Jinsheng Fang, Lijun Bao, Xu Li, Peter C M van Zijl, Zhong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jinsheng FangDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Lijun BaoDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xu LiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter C M van ZijlDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zhong ChenDepartment of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health P41EB015909National Natural Science Foundation of China 11761141010National Natural Science Foundation of China 81301277NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NNSF of China U1632274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of human brain, the background field induced by air-tissue interface varies significantly with respect to the rotation angle between the head and the static field, which may result in substantial error in the estimated magnetic susceptibility values. The goal of this study was to develop a strategy to better remove such orientation dependent background field.

methodsAn improved background field removal method is proposed based on the sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data using a region adaptive kernel (R-SHARP), named iRSHARP. It uses a spatially weighted spherical Gaussian kernel exploiting the amplitude, gradient, and wrap count of the phase map. The method was validated using both numerical simulations and in vivo human brain data at multiple head orientations. Performance was compared with the variable kernel (V-SHARP) and R-SHARP methods.

resultsThe proposed iRSHARP method showed improved background removal over R-SHARP while cutting the computational time in half. As compared to V-SHARP and R-SHARP, the iRSHARP generated local field and susceptibility maps showed fewer artifacts in regions of large susceptibility variations, and for the in vivo human brain, the susceptibilities of the deep gray matter nuclei were consistent with the in vivo gold-standard "Calculation of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientation Sampling" (COSMOS) values.

conclusioniRSHARP can remove the orientation dependent background field effectively. Using iRSHARP, the paranasal sinus regions can be preserved in the brain mask and the brain integrity was conserved, which may facilitate further data analysis and clinical application.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationFourier AnalysisGray MatterHeadHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, StatisticalNormal DistributionPhantoms, ImagingRotationbackground field removalorientation dependentquantitative susceptibility mappingspatially weighted kernel

Identifiers

PMID30298547
PMCPMC6379075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.