ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2019
Background field removal for susceptibility mapping of human brain with large susceptibility variations.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does quantitative susceptibility mapping elucidate age-related alterations in deep gray matter iron deposition? A systematic review.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Review
- Multimodal imaging and machine learning for diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with cognitive impairment: ASL and QSM as potential biomarkers.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Reduced Oxygen Extraction Fraction as a Biomarker for Cognitive Deficits in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping based basal ganglia segmentation via AGSeg: leveraging active gradient guiding mechanism in deep learning.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Recommended implementation of quantitative susceptibility mapping for clinical research in the brain: A consensus of the ISMRM electro-magnetic tissue properties study group.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- Maximum spherical mean value filtering for whole-brain QSM.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- A latent code based multi-variable modulation network for susceptibility mapping.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Quantitative susceptibility mapping shows lower brain iron content in children with autism.European radiology · 2021Article
- Methodological Considerations for Neuroimaging in Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- 3 versus 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures in clinical settings.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of human brain, the background field induced by air-tissue interface varies significantly with respect to the rotation angle between the head and the static field, which may result in substantial error in the estimated magnetic susceptibility values. The goal of this study was to develop a strategy to better remove such orientation dependent background field.
methodsAn improved background field removal method is proposed based on the sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data using a region adaptive kernel (R-SHARP), named iRSHARP. It uses a spatially weighted spherical Gaussian kernel exploiting the amplitude, gradient, and wrap count of the phase map. The method was validated using both numerical simulations and in vivo human brain data at multiple head orientations. Performance was compared with the variable kernel (V-SHARP) and R-SHARP methods.
resultsThe proposed iRSHARP method showed improved background removal over R-SHARP while cutting the computational time in half. As compared to V-SHARP and R-SHARP, the iRSHARP generated local field and susceptibility maps showed fewer artifacts in regions of large susceptibility variations, and for the in vivo human brain, the susceptibilities of the deep gray matter nuclei were consistent with the in vivo gold-standard "Calculation of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientation Sampling" (COSMOS) values.
conclusioniRSHARP can remove the orientation dependent background field effectively. Using iRSHARP, the paranasal sinus regions can be preserved in the brain mask and the brain integrity was conserved, which may facilitate further data analysis and clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.