Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298473›Full record

Trial reportInfection2019

A phase III, open-label, single-arm, study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent, surface antigen inactivated subunit influenza virus vaccine produced in mammalian cell culture (Optaflu®) in healthy adults.

Micha Loebermann, Carlos Fritzsche, Hilte Geerdes-Fenge, Esther Heijnen, Daniel Kirby, Emil C Reisinger

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Statement for 2021-2022.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2021
    Article
  3. Summary of the NACI Supplemental Statement on Mammalian Cell Culture-Based Influenza Vaccines.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Micha LoebermannDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann Strasse 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany. micha.loebermann@uni-rostock.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-8998
Carlos FritzscheDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann Strasse 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Hilte Geerdes-FengeDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann Strasse 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Esther HeijnenSeqirus, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniel KirbySeqirus, Summit, NJ, USA.
Emil C ReisingerDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann Strasse 6, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
University of Rostock · DESeqirus (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is an essential tool in reducing the impact of seasonal influenza infections. The viral strains responsible for seasonal outbreaks vary annually, and preventive vaccines have to be adapted accordingly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, clinical tolerability and the antibody response to each of the three influenza vaccine antigens after vaccination with a cell-derived, trivalent, surface antigen, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIVc), as measured by single radial haemolysis (SRH) or haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay in accordance with European Union licensing guidelines in place for years 2013/2014. This phase 3, open-label, single-arm study enrolled 126 healthy adults divided into two age groups (63 subjects aged 18 to ≤ 60 years and 63 subjects aged ≥ 61 years). Antibody titres were measured before and 21 days after vaccination. Adverse events were determined using diary cards, interviews and reviews of the available medical records. One subject was lost to follow-up and three subjects had protocol deviations. Following vaccination, protective HI antibody titres (≥ 1:40) were detected in 100%, 97%, and 94% of the younger adults (18-≤ 60 years) and in 97%, 95%, and 80% of the older adults (≥ 61 years) against the A (H1N1), A (H3N2), and B influenza strains respectively. The antibody response licensing criteria were met in both age groups. Solicited adverse events were reported by 57% subjects 18 to ≤ 60 years and 35% subjects ≥ 61 years. Among the younger adults 51% had local and 27% had systemic adverse events, whereas of the older subjects 29% had local and 13% had systemic adverse events (mainly injection site pain or headache in both age groups). Unsolicited adverse events at least possibly related to the vaccine were mild and detected in 3% of the younger adults and none of the older adults. Overall, the trivalent, surface antigen, inactivated subunit influenza virus vaccine produced in mammalian cell culture proved to be safe and immunogenic in younger and older healthy adults.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, ViralFemaleGermanyHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAntigens, ViralInfluenza VaccinesCell derivedImmunogenicitySafetySeasonal influenza vaccine

Identifiers

PMID30298473
OpenAlexW2896916839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.