ArticlePlant molecular biology2018
Frond transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens for Lemna minor.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Duckweeds: from fundamental biology to a sustainable plant chassis for biotechnology.Advanced biotechnology · 2026Review
- Duckweeds: Model organisms for research on plant sterols and steroids.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Harnessing the potential of duckweed: biological insights and ecological applications.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Atypical epigenetic and small RNA control of degenerated transposons and their fragments in clonally reproducingGenome research · 2025Article
- Utilization of Microalgae and Duckweed as Sustainable Protein Sources for Food and Feed: Nutritional Potential and Functional Applications.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Review
- The evolution of the duckweed ionome mirrors losses in structural complexity.Annals of botany · 2024Article
- Duckweeds for Phytoremediation of Polluted Water.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Rapid and Highly Efficient Genetic Transformation and Application of Interleukin-17B Expressed in Duckweed as Mucosal Vaccine Adjuvant.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Characterization of defense responses against bacterial pathogens in duckweeds lacking EDS1.The New phytologist · 2022Article
- Duckweed: a potential phytosensor for heavy metals.Plant cell reports · 2022Review
- Return of the Lemnaceae: duckweed as a model plant system in the genomics and postgenomics era.The Plant cell · 2021Article
- Article
- Research Progress of a Potential Bioreactor: Duckweed.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Efficient genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Lemna aequinoctialis.Plant biotechnology journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Lemnaceae, known as duckweed, the smallest flowering aquatic plant, shows promise as a plant bioreactor. For applying this potential plant bioreactor, establishing a stable and efficient genetic transformation system is necessary. The currently favored callus-based method for duckweed transformation is time consuming and genotype limited, as it requires callus culture and regeneration, which is inapplicable to many elite duckweed strains suitable for bioreactor exploitation. In this study, we attempted to establish a simple frond transformation system mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens for Lemna minor, one of the most widespread duckweed species in the world. To evaluate the feasibility of the new transformation system, the gene CYP710A11 was overexpressed to improve the yield of stigmasterol, which has multiple medicinal purposes. Three L. minor strains, ZH0055, D0158 and M0165, were transformed by both a conventional callus transformation system (CTS) and the simple frond transformation system (FTS). GUS staining, PCR, quantitative PCR and stigmasterol content detection showed that FTS can produce stable transgenic lines as well as CTS. Moreover, compared to CTS, FTS can avoid the genotype constraints of callus induction, thus saving at least half of the required processing time (CTS took 8-9 months while FTS took approximately 3 months in this study). Therefore, this transformation system is feasible in producing stable transgenic lines for a wide range of L. minor genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30298427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.