Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298357›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2019

Measuring facial identity and emotion integration using the redundancy gain paradigm.

Leia Vrancken, Elke Vermeulen, Filip Germeys, Karl Verfaillie

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leia VranckenBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Elke VermeulenBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip GermeysBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Karl VerfaillieBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. karl.verfaillie@kuleuven.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early theories on face perception posit that invariant (i.e., identity) and changeable (i.e., expression) facial aspects are processed separately. However, many researchers have countered the hypothesis of parallel processes with findings of interactions between identity and emotion perception. The majority of tasks measuring interactions between identity and emotion employ a selective attention design, in which participants are instructed to attend to one dimension (e.g., identity) while the other dimension varies orthogonally (e.g., emotion), but is task irrelevant. Recently, a divided attention design (i.e., the redundancy gain paradigm) in which both identity and emotion are task relevant was employed to assess the interaction between identity and emotion. A redundancy gain is calculated by a drop in reaction time in trials in which a target from both dimensions is present in the stimulus face (e.g., "sad Person A"), compared with trials with only a single target present (e.g., "sad" or "Person A"). Redundancy gains are hypothesized to point to an interactive activation of both dimensions, and as such, could complement designs adopting a selective attention task. The initial aim of the current study was to reproduce the earlier findings with this paradigm on identity and emotion perception (Yankouskaya, Booth, & Humphreys, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1692-1711, 2012), but our study failed to replicate the results. In a series of subtasks, multiple aspects of the design were manipulated separately in our goal to shed light on the factors that influence the redundancy gain effect in faces. A redundancy gain was eventually obtained after controlling for contingencies and stimulus presentation time.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAdolescentAdultAttentionEmotionsFacial RecognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationPsychophysicsReaction TimeYoung AdultDivided attentionFace perceptionIdentity/emotion integrationRedundancy gain

Identifiers

PMID30298357
PMCPMC6315006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.