Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298336›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2019

Effects of Osmotic Therapy on Pupil Reactivity: Quantification Using Pupillometry in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients.

C Ong, M Hutch, M Barra, A Kim, S Zafar, S Smirnakis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04490005 (Outcome pRognostication of Acute Brain Injury With the NeuroloGical Pupil), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04490005 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Outcome pRognostication of Acute Brain Injury With the NeuroloGical Pupil

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Milano BicoccaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled118ConditionsAcute Brain Injury, Pupillary Reflex ImpairedArmspupillometry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Abnormal neurological pupil index is associated with malignant cerebral edema after mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusion patients.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  20. Automated Pupillometry in Neurocritical Care: Research and Practice.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C OngBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA. cjong@bu.edu.
M HutchBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
M BarraMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
A KimBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
S ZafarMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
S SmirnakisBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsmotic therapy is a critical component of medical management for cerebral edema. While up to 90% of neurointensivists report using these treatments, few quantitative clinical measurements guide optimal timing, dose, or administration frequency. Its use is frequently triggered by a qualitative assessment of neurologic deterioration and/or pupil size, and anecdotally appears to improve pupil asymmetry suggestive of uncal herniation. However, subjective pupil assessment has poor reliability, making it difficult to detect or track subtle changes. We hypothesized that osmotic therapy reproducibly improves quantitative pupil metrics.

methodsWe included patients at two centers who had recorded quantitative pupil measurements within 2 h before and after either 20% mannitol or 23.4% hypertonic saline in the neurosciences intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the Neurologic Pupil Index (NPi), a composite metric ranging from 0 to 5 in which > 3 is considered normal. Secondary outcomes included pupil size, percent change, constriction and dilation velocity, and latency. Results were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Chi-square and multi-level linear regression to control for other edema-reducing interventions.

resultsOut of 72 admissions (403 paired pupil observations), NPi significantly differed within 2 h of osmotic therapy when controlling for other commonly used interventions in our whole cohort (β = 0.08, p = 0.0168). The effect was most pronounced (β = 0.57) in patients with abnormal NPi prior to intervention (p = 0.0235).

conclusionsPupil reactivity significantly improves after osmotic therapy in a heterogenous critically ill population when controlling for various other interventions. Future work is necessary to determine dose-dependent effects and clinical utility.

Indexed as

PupilAdultAgedBrain DiseasesBrain EdemaCritical CareDiuretics, OsmoticFemaleHumansMaleMannitolMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSaline Solution, HypertonicDiuretics, OsmoticMannitolSaline Solution, HypertonicCerebral edemaHypertonic salineMannitol

Identifiers

PMID30298336
OpenAlexW2895241096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.