Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30298309›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2019

Preventing Future Deaths from Medicines: Responses to Coroners' Concerns in England and Wales.

Robin E Ferner, Tohfa Ahmad, Zainab Babatunde, Anthony R Cox

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coroner inquest into 'hospital non-attendance' management in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin E FernerWest Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK. r.e.ferner@bham.ac.uk.
Tohfa AhmadWest Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Zainab BabatundeInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anthony R CoxWest Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Birmingham Research Park · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoroners inquire into sudden, unexpected, or unnatural deaths. We have previously established 99 cases (100 deaths) in England and Wales in which medicines or part of the medication process or both were mentioned in coroners' 'Regulation 28 Reports to Prevent Future Deaths' (coroners' reports).

objectiveWe wished to see what responses were made by National Health Service (NHS) organizations and others to these 99 coroners' reports.

methodsWhere possible, we identified the party or parties to whom these reports were addressed (names were occasionally redacted). We then sought responses, either from the UK judiciary website or by making requests to the addressee directly or, for NHS and government entities, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Responses were analysed by theme to indicate the steps taken to prevent future deaths.

resultsWe were able to analyse one or more responses to 69/99 cases from 106 organizations. We analysed 201 separate actions proposed or taken to address the 160 concerns expressed by coroners. Staff education or training was the most common form of action taken (44/201). Some organisations made changes in process (24/201) or policy (17/201), and some felt existing policies were sufficient to address some concerns (22/201).

conclusionsCoroners' concerns are often of national importance but are not currently shared nationally. Only a minority of responses to coroners' reports concerning medicines are in the public domain. Processes for auditing responses and assessing their effectiveness are opaque. Few of the responses appear to provide robust and generally applicable ways to prevent future deaths.

Indexed as

Coroners and Medical ExaminersDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMedication ErrorsCause of DeathEnglandHumansState MedicineWales

Identifiers

PMID30298309
OpenAlexW2896475093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.